How Does the Rate Law Indicate Reaction Mechanism Complexity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the rate law for the reaction 2I^-(aq) + S2O8^2-(aq) -> 2SO4^2-(aq) + I2(aq) under the assumption of a single-step mechanism. The provided rate law is rate = k[S2O8^2-][I^-]^2, which indicates that the reaction involves both reactants in a second-order relationship. The user concludes that their experimentally determined rate law does not match this expression, suggesting that the reaction cannot proceed through a single-step mechanism. The analysis highlights the complexity of reaction mechanisms as indicated by the rate law. Understanding the relationship between the rate law and reaction steps is crucial in chemistry.
loadsy
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
"The Rate Law" in Chemistry

Hey I've just been working on a chemistry lab lately in my chemistry course, and one of the problems on the lab write-up asks to:

Write the rate law for the following reaction, if it were to occur through a single-step mechanism.
2I^-(aq) + S2O8^2-(aq) -> 2SO4^2-(aq) + I2(aq)

Now since it is asking to write it as a single-step mechanism I would assume there is only one step needed.

Now in the lab it has given us this formula:

rate = -(delta[S2O8^-2])/(delta t) = -(1/2)(delta [I^-])/(delta t) = (1/2)(delta[SO4^2-])/(delta t) = (delta[I2])/(delta t)

So could you not just say the only step needed is:
-(delta[S2O8^-2])/(delta t) = (delta[I2])/(delta t)

Then for the second part to the question it asks "By examination of the experimentally determined rate law, explain whether this reaction does in fact proceed through a single-step mechanism. Explain."

Any help on this problem would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rate law would be

rate=k(forward)[I-]^2[S2O8]

does your experimentally determined rate law concur with this expression?
 
The rate law would be

rate=k(forward)[I-]^2[S2O8]

does your experimentally determined rate law concur with this expression?
 
Ahh I see what you are saying, yeah it's just
rate=k[S2O8^2-][I^-]^2

And my rate law does not coincide with this, therefore it cannot be a single-step mechanism. Gotcha! Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top