How Does Theorem 4.5 Relate to P's and Q's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter g.lemaitre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearity
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-07-19at24040AM.png


here is theorem 4.5

Screenshot2012-07-19at23441AM.png



The Attempt at a Solution



How can theorem 4.5 even relate to the question? The question deals with p's and q's and the theorem deals with u v w.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short version of what I said in the other thread is this:

The theorem deals with three arbitrary vectors that are elements of a given vector space. They do not need to be called u, v, and w.
 
well how do i even find out if
p(x) = a0 + a1x + a2x2
q(x) = b0 + b1x + b2x2 and P2
meets the condition (u+v) *w = u*w + v*w?
What's the first question I ask myself? I don't even know what step 1 is, much less 2 and 3
 
P_2 denotes the space of second-order polynomials. All you need to test this condition is to come up with a third "vector" (another second-order polynomial) that you can plug in as w.

This condition you're testing is the distributive property. It's the same thing as saying that (5+10)x6 = 5x6 + 10x6. I can plug in any three numbers there instead of 5, 10, and 6 and it works because the real line is a (very simple) vector space of sorts.

What you do to test this is simple. If I want to test the distributive property on real numbers, I go to what I just wrote and say, hm, is (5+10)x6 -> 15x6 really equal to 5x6 + 10x6?

At that point, you just evaluate both sides until you get something that's obviously (un)equal.
 
ok, i got it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top