How does this solution make any sense? (Tension problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the equilibrant/resultant method in solving tension problems. A participant expresses confusion about how to represent forces F1 and F2 in a triangle, questioning the apparent partial representation of F1. Clarification is provided that the length of the rope does not equate to the length of the force vector, emphasizing that the geometry only indicates force directions. This explanation resolves the confusion, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between physical lengths and vector representations in physics.
Unqualifiedlol
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the formatting template for all homework help requests
o4m6r6u.png


I know how to solve this problem with x and y components but how do I solve it with the equilibrant/resultant method? I don't understand how you can make a triangle with both F1 and F2 when in the diagram it looks like the magnitude F1 is only partially represented? Why are we just ignoring the rest of the vector? The answer is right of course but I just don't get it
 

Attachments

  • o4m6r6u.png
    o4m6r6u.png
    31.8 KB · Views: 1,057
Physics news on Phys.org
Unqualifiedlol said:
it looks like the magnitude F1 is only partially represented?
It looks fully represented to me. Can you explain your issue a bit more?
 
haruspex said:
It looks fully represented to me. Can you explain your issue a bit more?
Well, because F1 is the tension of the left rope right? In the triangle, it seems like only a section of the "rope" is included in the triangle, while the rest is excluded. Why is that?
 
Unqualifiedlol said:
Well, because F1 is the tension of the left rope right? In the triangle, it seems like only a section of the "rope" is included in the triangle, while the rest is excluded. Why is that?
You appear to be confusing length of rope with length of force vector. The geometry of the rope only tells you the directions of the forces.
 
  • Like
Likes Unqualifiedlol
haruspex said:
You appear to be confusing length of rope with length of force vector. The geometry of the rope only tells you the directions of the forces.
Thank you so much, that cleared it all up haha.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top