How does this statement follow? (adjoints on Hilbert spaces)

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
If A is an operator on a Hilbert space H and A* is its adjoint, then
upload_2015-8-8_5-53-38.png
. That is, the orthogonal complement of the range of A is the same subspace as the kernel of its adjoint.

Then the author I am reading says it follows that the statements "The range of A is a dense subspace of H" and "A* is injective on Dom(A*)" are equivalent. Can someone explain please?

The operators A and A* are not assumed to be bounded and so their domains may not be all of H and their domains may not be equal to each other.

It could also be that I am misreading this entirely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top