How Does Time Dilation Symmetry Work in a Rocket Traveling at 0.8c?

AI Thread Summary
Time dilation symmetry is illustrated through a scenario involving a rocket traveling at 0.8c between two stations, P and Q, with different time measurements observed. The rocket's passengers experience 34 minutes of proper time, while observers on the space station measure 60 minutes for the journey. The discussion raises questions about the perceived motion of the observer at station Q, who believes he is moving while the rocket is at rest. This leads to confusion regarding the comparison of time between the traveler and the stationmaster, as their watches show different elapsed times. The core issue revolves around understanding how the symmetry of time dilation operates when both observers perceive themselves as being in motion.
kapitan90
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I have a problem connected with time dilation symmetry, which is supposed to be explained in a following example:

A rocket traveling at 0.8c starts from station P and is directed to station Q 864 million km away. Time taken to travel as measured by space station clocks is 60minutes.
The proper time, measured by the passenger is then 34 minutes.
But what if the observer in station Q claims he was moving and the rocket was at rest?
Imagine a long rod from P to Q with clocks placed along it at regular intervals. Observer at Q sets his watch looking at the watch on the rod that is in front of him.
When a rocket reaches him, his watch shows 34 minutes, and watch on a rocket shows 60 minutes (so, they conclude that time dilation is symmetric).

Homework Equations


I don't understand whether the two described situations differ and if yes, how they differ. If a traveller and a stationmaster compare their watches they will see whose watch is slow - at first, it's the travellers watch and then it's the stationmaster's watch. Then, something surely must have changed, yet I don't know what exactly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a question that was given to you, or did you just come up with it to portray what is confusing you?
 
Disconnected said:
Is this a question that was given to you, or did you just come up with it to portray what is confusing you?

This is an extract from my textbook, when they explain time dilation symmetry. I don't understand the second part of it, when the observer at Q is moving.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top