How Does Torque Affect Body Stability in Ergonomics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pennywise1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
Torque plays a crucial role in body stability and ergonomics by influencing how forces are applied at different distances from a pivot point, affecting rotational movement. The total torque on a body is the sum of individual torques, which must equal zero for equilibrium, indicating that a body cannot change its rotational motion without external torque. The relationship between torque and angular momentum highlights that stability is linked to the body's center of mass and base of support. Understanding how torque affects joint rotation can inform ergonomic practices aimed at improving stability. Overall, the correlation between torque and stability is essential for optimizing ergonomic design and functionality.
pennywise1234
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
what role does torque play in body stability and ergonomics ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what level of explanation you want... Most simply, torque is a turning moment. The idea of torque is that if you apply a force at a greater distance, you get a bigger rotation - it would be easier to swing a cat by its tail than its middle (if you wished to swing cats), and it requires less effort to open a door from the edge, rather than at the pivot.

If you want a mathematical definition:

$$ \tau_{Total} = \sum_{i} \tau_{i} = \sum_{i} \vec{r_{i}} \times \vec{F_{i}} $$

Where ##\tau_{Total}## is the total torque on the body, and is the sum of a number of torques, ##\tau_{i} = \vec{r_{i}} \times \vec{F_{i}}## where, ##\vec{r_{i}}## is the position vector, and ##\vec{F_{i}}## is the force.

The angular momentum of a body is related to the torque applied:

$$ \vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p} $$

$$ \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \times \vec{p} + \vec{r} \times \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} $$

So

$$ \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F} $$

i.e -if we don't have any torque, then the angular momentum must be constant in time. The body cannot be spinning up or spinning down - in cannot be changing its motion in any rotational sense. So in this way, we see that a necessary (but not sufficient! - e.g we also have to balance forces) condition for equilibrium is that the total torques on a body must be zero...

Does that help at all?
 
Penny... have a think about the joints in the human body. I think all (?) Involve rotation.
 
The question is more geared towards when trying to improve stability or how do stability and torque correlate. I was thinking it had to do with Centre of mass or base of support. I have no idea what could be said for ergonomics
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top