How does turbulence affect the boundary layer and create drag on swimsuits?

AI Thread Summary
Swimsuits can create a phenomenon where water adheres longer to the fabric, reducing drag, similar to how dimples on golf balls enhance airflow. The discussion centers on how turbulent boundary layers can increase water adhesion due to enhanced pressure and dynamic viscosity, countering the assumption that turbulence would cause quicker separation. There is curiosity about why wings aren't designed like golf balls if turbulent layers reduce drag. The conversation also critiques the tendency to provide basic links instead of engaging in deeper discussion. Understanding these fluid dynamics principles can lead to better swimsuit designs and aerodynamics.
WhiteRaven
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi, I'm just currently doing some research on swimsuits and how they work. i have found that 1 type of swimsuit makes water "stick" to the suit longer so the water doesn't separate and cause drag. i notice this is very similar to how golf balls work with the dimples making the air stick longer to the Boundary Layer. my question is, how does a turbulent boundary layer get the water to "stick" longer to the suit? wouldn't it be the other way around, turbulent making the water come off more quickly? also how exactly does water seperating from the boundary layer create drag? btw if there are any great websites to refer me to would be very helpful

thanks
wr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks, but the question still remains, why does turbulent flow make water "stick" to the boundary layer?
 
As far as I know turbulence pressurizes additionally the boundary layer against the wall. Also dynamic viscosity is virtually increased due to the turbulent stresses (turbulent viscosity). One could think of the contrary behaviour, but the external eddies enhances the more grip of the layer.

I have another question: if a turbulent layer has less drag, why do not the wings are shaped like the surface of golf balls?. I mean with those small holes on the surface.

I've tried to give you a <more humanitarian> answer than that posted a little above. I assume you have googled a bit before coming here, so that answering you with links to encyclopedias is... :zzz:
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top