How Does Uniform Angular Acceleration Affect Rotation Angles Over Time?

AI Thread Summary
A wheel with uniform angular acceleration starts from rest and rotates 90.6 degrees in the first second. The subsequent angles for the next two seconds will increase due to the acceleration, meaning the rotation will not simply double. The correct approach involves using rotational kinematic equations, substituting degrees with radians for calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between angular displacement, angular velocity, and angular acceleration. Proper unit conversion and application of the formulas are crucial for accurate results.
JSapit
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wheel is subjected to uniform angular acceleration. Initially its angular velocity is zero. During the first 1-s time interval, it rotates through an angle of 90.6degrees.

(a) Through what angle does it rotate during the next 1-s time interval?(in degrees)

(b) Through what angle during the third 1-s time interval?(in degrees)

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



I just tried multiplying the 90.6 by 2, and putting in 90.6 itself, because I thought that might be the answer, but I forgot that it was the acceleration, and that the next values would increase in smaller increments, because it is speeding up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use all your equations you've been using for constant acceleration, like d=1/2at^2+Vi*t, but now you use the rotational "versions"

so instead of distance in meters, you have the angle traveled in radians, instead of velocity in meters/second, angular velocity in radians/second, and acceleration is radians/s^2

So in one second it goes from 0 degrees to 90.6 starting from rest(you'll need radians!)this is like knowing distance, time, and initial velocity
 
Okay, so since I have 5400 rev/min, I divide it by 60 to get 90 rev/sec. Then I multiply it by 2*Pi for the angular velocity in radians, right? Or am I doing something wrong?
 
That part's right

except the unit is radians/second
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top