How Does Wood Type Affect Bullet Velocity in a Ballistic Pendulum Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the type of wood affects bullet velocity in a ballistic pendulum experiment. It outlines a scenario where a bullet collides with a wooden block, and the initial velocity of the bullet is calculated based on energy conservation principles. The key point is that the thermal energy losses during the inelastic collision are not dependent on the wood type but rather on the masses involved. It is concluded that the percentage loss of kinetic energy remains consistent regardless of the material characteristics, as the work done by friction during the collision is the same for different wood types. This highlights the relationship between energy, momentum, and Newton's laws in such experiments.
mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
This is a ballistic pendulum promlem, here is the scenerio that is outlined in my physics book:

We have a wooden block of mass 1.20kg hanging from a massless rope 1.5m in length. A bullet of mass .01kg is fired at the block. The collision is inelastic but thermal losses from impact are unknown. The block travels through to a maximum θ=40o. What is the initial velocity (Vib) of the bullet?


mb=.01kg

Mw=1.20kg

Lrope=1.5m

θ=40

Since theta is a known we can use this to find the energy in the system excluding our unknown thermal energy losses; @ max height we get a PE of:

Ug=(mb+Mw)χgχ(L-Lχcos(θ))

This number can now be used to calculate velocity at the bottom of the swing when all PE has been converted to KE like so:

KE=PE

(1/2)χ(mb+Mw)χv^2=(mb+Mw)χgχ(L-Lχcos(θ))

solve for v:

v=[2(mb+Mw)χgχ(L-Lcos(θ))/((mb+Mw)]^(1/2)

v=[2χgχ(L-Lχcos(θ))]^(1/2)

v=2.62m/s



Now this is where I am having an issue, this is the remainder of the solution shown in the book:

Coservation of linear moentum Pf=Pi

(Mw+mb)χv=Mwχ(Viw)+mbχ(Vib)

Solve for Vib:

Vib=vχ(Mw+mb)/mb

giving our value of Vib=320m/s



Here is where I am having issues; let's change the scenerio slightly, same exact experiment however with two different types of wood. Now let us say the thermal losses in the system of each type of wood and the bullet is slightly different. The first experiment will use pine and let's say it behaves identically to the problem we have 'solved' above. A great deal of the initial kinetic energy of the bullet is lost to thermal energy in our piece of pine resulting in a small theta of 40 degress.

Now let's say the other experiment is identical however the wood is now oak (same mass). If oak/bullet system has a different displacement of thermal energy then more(or less depending on the situation) of the bullets initial KE is put into the system as work resulting in a larger(or smaller, once again depending on thermal losses) theta. Now as theta is increased(or decreased) we know our final velocity will be larger(or smaller), but the book says:

Vib=vχ(Mw+mb)/mb

This means that the Vib(velocity of our bullet) is a function based on the velocity (v) but our v is now a larger(or smaller) value for the oak/bullet system than it is for pine/bullet system so somehow by changing the type of wood (according to the books arguement) results in a change in the velocity (Vib)of an identical bullet from an identical gun.

The only way I see this working is if the thermal losses are identical regardless of the materials that the bullet and block are made of, which would be quite remarkable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mesa said:
The only way I see this working is if the thermal losses are identical regardless of the materials that the bullet and block are made of, which would be quite remarkable.

Seems remarkable, but your conclusion is true. For a completely inelastic collision, you can show that the % loss of the initial KE depends only on the masses, not on the characteristics of the materials of the objects.

If the block that receives the bullet is "soft" then the friction force, f, on the bullet is relatively small and the bullet travels a good distance, d, into the block. For a hard block, f is greater but d is smaller. The work "done by friction", fd, is the same.
 
TSny said:
Seems remarkable, but your conclusion is true. For a completely inelastic collision, you can show that the % loss of the initial KE depends only on the masses, not on the characteristics of the materials of the objects.

If the block that receives the bullet is "soft" then the friction force, f, on the bullet is relatively small and the bullet travels a good distance, d, into the block. For a hard block, f is greater but d is smaller. The work "done by friction", fd, is the same.

Very good. So it seems the shape would not matter as well. Such a nice relation between energy, momentum, and Newtons Laws, it's quite wonderful.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top