How Far Could Light Travel by the Time of Decoupling in an Expanding Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cheetox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Time
Cheetox
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the time of decoupling the universe was 1/1000 of its present size. How for could light have traveled in the time up to decoupling? (assume that the universe was dominated by radiation until then)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm a little confused about how to include the fact that the universe was expanding while the light was traveling up to the time of decoupling.

I have the age of the universe at decoupling(calculated earlier) and I have calculated the scale factor as a function of time for a radiation dominated universe. I assume that the scale factor means that light travels less distance with time as distance is expanding but I'm not sure about this...and how would I calculate this distance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a hint: light travels a distance of cdt in a Newtonian world, but there's a scale factor, so dr=cdt/a(t).
 
the equation given above is right but according to the book's answer the distance light has traveled is equal to simple [c x t]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top