How Far Does the Spring Compress When Two Colliding Masses Come to a Stop?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a collision between two masses, m1 and m2, where m1 is moving toward m2, which is attached to a spring. The conservation of momentum and mechanical energy equations are used to determine the maximum compression of the spring. Participants note that the calculated compression exceeds the spring's natural length, indicating a flaw in the initial setup or parameters. Concerns are raised about the unrealistic speed of m1, suggesting that a lower speed would yield a plausible result. Ultimately, it is concluded that the scenario presented is physically impossible, and the question may imply that the masses come to a complete stop with no distance between them.
azurken
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
An object with mass m1=0.4kg moves at v0=10 m/s toward a second object with mass m2 = 0.8kg. Attached to the second object is a spring with spring constant k = 200N/m, and natural length L0 = 0.1m. As the objects collide the spring is initially compressed. After compressing a maximum amount the spring then decompresses and the masses move apart. At the instant that the spring is compressed its maximum amount, the masses move with the same speed V. Determine the closest distant X, between the objects at this instant. Both momentum and mech energy are conserved.

M1=0.4kg
M2=0.8kg
V1=10 m/s
V2=0 (at rest)
K= 200N/m
L0=0.1m
X=?


2. Homework Equations
Vf=(m1v1+m2v2)/(m1+m2)

SPE=0.5Kx^2

KE=0.5mV^2

X=L-L0

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Vf=(.4)(10)/(1.2)=3.333

Alright so it's asking me maximum compression of the spring. and since they travel at the same speed later on I can count on them to have the masses combined at that moment right?

I used 1/2*m1v1^2=1/2*(m1+m2)*V^2 + 1/2*k*x^2

If i go with this formula, I'll get an X that is higher than the 0.1m of the natural length which doesn't make sense if it's compressing. (how can it compress more than 0.1m)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azurken said:
An object with mass m1=0.4kg moves at v0=10 m/s toward a second object with mass m2 = 0.8kg. Attached to the second object is a spring with spring constant k = 200N/m, and natural length L0 = 0.1m. As the objects collide the spring is initially compressed. After compressing a maximum amount the spring then decompresses and the masses move apart. At the instant that the spring is compressed its maximum amount, the masses move with the same speed V. Determine the closest distant X, between the objects at this instant. Both momentum and mech energy are conserved.

M1=0.4kg
M2=0.8kg
V1=10 m/s
V2=0 (at rest)
K= 200N/m
L0=0.1m
X=?


2. Homework Equations
Vf=(m1v1+m2v2)/(m1+m2)

SPE=0.5Kx^2

KE=0.5mV^2

X=L-L0

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Vf=(.4)(10)/(1.2)=3.333

Alright so it's asking me maximum compression of the spring. and since they travel at the same speed later on I can count on them to have the masses combined at that moment right?

I used 1/2*m1v1^2=1/2*(m1+m2)*V^2 + 1/2*k*x^2

If i go with this formula, I'll get an X that is higher than the 0.1m of the natural length which doesn't make sense if it's compressing. (how can it compress more than 0.1m)


It can't compress that far, so the initial set-up is not plausible. I agree the "theoretical answer" is greater than 0.1 m.

10m/s is really fast for an object moving in the lab [you have to drop a brick 5m to get up to speeds like that]. I am sure that is mass 1 was only traveling at 1.0 m/s you would get both a plausible answer, and involving speeds and masses you might find in the lab.
 
Yeah I've confirmed it with someone else. The equation I used is correct. Either the spring constant is too small or/and the natural length is too small. The maximum the spring can absorb is even less than 1 J which leaves more than 19J left for the 2 masses KE to fill and can't be filled with 3.33 m/s alone for those two masses.

It's physically impossible and my teacher made a mistake IM SURE OF IT. It'll go to an answer greater than 0.1m. Which physically means there is no distance between them and the objects would be moving together with no space between them (meaning about roughly 5m/s for the two objects).
 
He didn't ask how far the spring compresses he asked how close the masses get. I suspect he knows the answer is zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top