How Far Down Does the Stone Strike the Opposite Building Wall?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a stone thrown from one building to another, with a focus on calculating how far down it strikes the opposite wall. The initial calculations for horizontal and vertical velocity components were performed using degrees, but the participant later hypothesized that the book might have used radians, leading to discrepancies in the results. After switching to radians, the calculations aligned with the book's answer of 41.8 meters. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting angle measures in physics problems, as using degrees versus radians significantly affects the outcome. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the book's answer is correct when radians are used, despite initial confusion.
chudd88
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Note: I figured this out. See my follow-up. Thanks.

Homework Statement



Two tall buildings of equal height stand with vertical walls 40m apart. A stone is thrown from the top of one at an angle of 25 degrees below the horizontal and directly at the other building with a velocity of 18 m/s. How far down from the top does it strike the opposite wall?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Note, first of all, that the picture it shows in my book has the stone coming off the very top of the building. There's no one throwing the stone, so it's being thrown at y=0, where the very top of the building is 0.

I've worked this problem several times, and I keep getting the same (wrong) answer, according to the answers at the end of my book. Here's my process:

25 degrees down, with an initial velocity of 18 m/s means the horizontal component of the velocity is: 18 m/s * cos(-25) = 16.31 m/s

The vertical component is 18 m/s * sin(-25) = -7.607 m/s

So far so good?

The stone will travel 40 m horizontally at 16.31 m/s, which means the time is 40 m / 16.31 m/s = 2.45s

So, with that, I can use my initial vertical velocity of -7.607 m/s, acceleration of -9.81 m/s^s, and time = 2.45s, to calculate the y.

y = (-7.607m/s)*(2.45s) + (1/2)*(-9.81m/s^2)(2.45^2) = -48.08 m

That's not the correct answer, according to my book. Can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong?

(The book says the answer is 41.8m, btw)

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I figured it out, sort of. It turns out I believe the answer in my book is wrong. Just because I had exhausted all other possibilities I could think of, I hypothesized that maybe the book accidentally used RADIANS instead of DEGREES when calculating the sin and cos values. When I switched my calculator to RADIANS, and ran the same calculations as I stated in my original post, I got the book's answer.

So, unless someone feels using RADIANS is appropriate for this problem (it isn't AFAIK), then I'll just conclude the book's wrong, and my original answer is correct.
 
regardless of whether degrees or radians are being used, you should come out on top with the same values for the x and y components of initial velocity.
 
Rake-MC said:
regardless of whether degrees or radians are being used, you should come out on top with the same values for the x and y components of initial velocity.

I don't follow. The initial x velocity is 18 m/s * cos(-25).

In radian measure, cos(-25) = 0.9912
In degree measure, cos(-25) = 0.9063

I was using degree measure in my initial post, and I've concluded that the book was (incorrectly) using radian measure. Maybe I'm wrong, but when radian measure is used, I get the book's answer. (Note, however, that they didn't use radian measure when calculating the sin(-25)).

So, from what I understand, using degrees or radians will completely change my initial x and y velocity components.
 
Ahh I see, in that case the book is incorrect, however that's not the correct interchange of radians and degrees. If the book specified that it's 25 degrees under horizontal, and you did -25 radians and it worked out, I can't argue that. But degrees and radians are proportional by \frac{1}{180} in that:

25^o = \frac{25\pi}{180}

As I interpreted it, you had entered the RHS as your value of radians (\frac{5pi}{36})
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top