How Far is the Ship from the Rocks When Sighting a Lighthouse?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance of a ship from a rocky cliff based on the height of a lighthouse and the angle at which a sailor sights it. The lighthouse is 49 feet tall, with a rocky cliff extending 19 feet from its base, while the sailor's eye level is 14 feet above the water. The initial calculation using the tangent function yields a distance of approximately 60.6 feet, but there is confusion regarding the interpretation of the cliff's extension. Participants agree that the problem's wording is unclear, particularly about the horizontal distance of the rocks from the lighthouse. Clarification of the problem's details is necessary to arrive at the correct answer.
cphill29
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A lighthouse that rises 49 ft above the surface of the water sits on a rocky cliff that extends 19 feet from its base. A sailor on the deck of a ship sights the top of the lighthouse at an angle of 30 degrees above the horizontal. If the sailor's eye level is 14 ft above the surface of the water, how far is the ship from the rocks?

Homework Equations



tanx=opp/adj

The Attempt at a Solution



tan30=35/x
xtan30=35
x=35/(tan30)
x=60.6 ft

Since the lighthouse is 49 feet above the surface and the sailor is 14 feet above the surface, the opposite side of the triangle is 35 feet, but I can't get the right answer doing this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wording of the problem is not that clear. I believe when saying that ' the rock cliff extends 19 feet from its base ' , that it means that the rocks start 19 feet horizontally away the lighthouse. So your method is correct, just make the necessary adjustment to your answer.
 
PhanthomJay said:
The wording of the problem is not that clear. I believe when saying that ' the rock cliff extends 19 feet from its base ' , that it means that the rocks start 19 feet horizontally away the lighthouse. So your method is correct, just make the necessary adjustment to your answer.

That's what I thought, too, but it gives me a picture and it's clear that is not the case. I did try it though and still got the answer wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top