How Far Should the Object Be Placed in a Microscope Setup for 75x Magnification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mithil03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope Optics
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a magnification of at least 75x in a microscope setup with two lenses, each having a focal length of 25mm and placed 36.5mm apart, the object distance from the first lens must be calculated. The magnification formula for a compound microscope can be rearranged to express the object distance (u) in terms of the focal lengths and the distance between the lenses. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply the lens formula correctly, considering the sign conventions for real images in convex lenses. The calculations suggest that the object distance can be derived without directly using the distance between the two lenses in the initial steps. Ultimately, the correct application of the formulas will yield the necessary object distance for the desired magnification.
mithil03
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose we have a microscope made out of two lenses, both with a focal length of
25mm, placed 36.5mm apart. Find how far in front of the first lens should the object be
placed to assure that the image is magnified at least by a factor of 75?

Homework Equations


The magnification for a compound microscope is : Mo x Me = (V/fo - 1) (1+ D/fe) or (-L/f1) (25/f2)

Lens formula: 1/v - 1/u = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure which equation to use as the first one doesn't make use of the distance btw the two lenses. And still not sure how Ill get the position of object from the first lens.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Mo x Me = (V/fo - 1) (1+ D/fe) or (-L/f1) (25/f2)

In the above formula V is the image distance. But you want the object distance. SO the formula can be rewritten as

MoxMe = fo/(fo+u)(1 + D/fe)

Now find u.
 


But I am still not using the value of the distance between the two lenses at all. By the above equation I am getting the answer as -73/3 .
 


According to me

75 = 2.5/(u - 2.5)*(1 + 25/2.5)

Solve it and find u. In this method length of the tube not necessary.
 


The formula is fo/(fo+u) right ? Here you are taking u-fo in the denominator ...Am i right ?
 


In the relevant equation you have written

1/v - 1/u = 1/f.

When you apply the sign convention, for the real image in convex lens the formula becomes

1/v + 1/u = 1/f. Multiply by u on both the sides. You get

u/v + 1 = u/fo Or

1/mo = u/fo - 1 Or

mo = fo/(u - fo)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top