How Far Will a Rolling Ball Go?

AI Thread Summary
A ball rolling on a horizontal rough floor will eventually stop due to rolling resistance rather than friction. The primary factor in this resistance is the energy loss from the deformation of both the ball and the surface it rolls on. Although kinetic friction plays a role during the deformation at the contact patch, static friction does not contribute to stopping the ball. The distance the ball travels before stopping is influenced by these forces and torques acting on it. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the motion of rolling objects.
Soumyajit6
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If a ball is given a velocity, and left on horizontal rough floor then after what distance it will stop rollig (slippingis absent) ?
Explain with force and torque acting on it .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction isn't required to slow and stop the rotation of a ball. The main reason for the torque is related to rolling resistance, most of which is due to energy loss from deformation as the surface of the ball compresses and then expands. There's also energy loss as the surface the ball is rolling on also compresses and expands. Kinectic (sliding) friction that occurs during the deformation at the contact patch, such as squirming, is also a component of rolling resistance (and for this component the friction does matter, but not static friction).

Wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top