How Far Will the Block Travel Up the Incline After Spring Release?

AI Thread Summary
A 2.0 kg block on a frictionless 30° incline is released from a compressed spring with a force constant of 19.6 N/cm, raising questions about energy transfer. The discussion highlights potential issues with assuming all spring potential energy converts to gravitational potential energy, particularly regarding the spring's behavior at its equilibrium position. Participants suggest that while conservation of energy principles apply, real-world factors like the spring's mass and kinetic energy complicate the scenario. The consensus leans towards the assumption that the spring stops acting on the block once it reaches equilibrium, although this may not be explicitly stated in the problem. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clarifying assumptions in physics problems.
Syrus
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Consider the following situation:

A 2.0 kg block is placed against a compressed spring on a frictionless 30° incline. The spring
of force constant 19.6 N/cm is compressed 20 cm and then released. How far up the incline will the block go before coming to rest?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The suggested (but perhaps naive) solution to this problem is to calculate the potential energy stored in the spring when it is compressed and set this value equal to the change in gravitational potential energy (see, for instance, http://www.physics.udel.edu/~jim/PHYS207_10J/Homework%20Solutions/Hwk7sol.pdf ). However, I see two fundamental problems with this approach:

First, suppose our system is composed of the block, spring, ramp, and Earth. Then at its highest point (as with its initial condition when it compresses the spring), the block has no kinetic energy. Let the release point be the reference point for gravitational potential energy (potential energy = 0) and the unstretched equilibrium length of the spring to be its potential energy reference point. What is to say that when the block reaches its highest point, the spring will be at its equilibrium position? If this is not the case, then it certainly can't be true that the entire spring potential energy may be converted to gravitational potential energy. What I see the problem to be is attributing the potential energy stored in the spring to the energy transferred to the ball. Is this not a problem, in general?

This problem is from an elementary text and, as such, may not be written paying attention to such details. Nonetheless, I have devised a solution which is independent of the abovementioned approach, but still poses some questions:

We may calculate the work done by the spring on the box as it is released (since we are given the force constant and initial compression of the spring) and set this value equal to the change in gravitational potential energy (in this case we take only the box, ramp, and Earth as our system). This equation holds since here an external force acts on our system. This approach also yields the *suggested solution. However, it doesn't seem obviously true that the spring stops acting (contacting) on the box as it passes through its equilibrium position (which is an underlying assumption of this method)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any advice?
 
I think your initial approach is right. Apply conservation of energy...The block continues up until the PE stored in the spring has all been converted to potential energy in the block.

I think the problem is that simple but you are right that in the real world it might not be quite like that..

What is to say that when the block reaches its highest point, the spring will be at its equilibrium position

Why does that matter? The block is not fixed to the spring just placed against it. Once the spring reaches it's rest position it's delivered all it's PE to the block.

In the real world the spring has mass and the end of the spring will have velocity and KE as it reaches and passes the rest point. In other words not all the PE ends up in the block. The question doesn't state that the spring is mass less but the mass isn't given so you can worry about that sort of thing. A massless spring can do things like stop instantly :-)
 
Ah, so the fundamental, simplifying assumption is that the spring instantly come to rest upon reaching its equilbrium length. Perhaps this should be stated in the problem, no?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top