How Fast Must a Bullet Travel to Melt on Impact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter riverjib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum nozzle velocity of a gun that causes a lead bullet to melt upon impact, the forensic investigator needs to calculate the total energy required to heat the bullet to its melting point and then melt it. The bullet, weighing 7.2g, requires 287.4J to reach the melting temperature of 327°C, and an additional 180J to melt, totaling 467.4J. This energy must be derived from the bullet's kinetic energy, which is given by the equation K = 1/2*m*v^2. By rearranging this equation to solve for velocity, the investigator can find the minimum nozzle velocity necessary for the bullet to melt on impact. Understanding the relationship between thermal energy and kinetic energy is crucial in solving this problem.
riverjib
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A forensic investigator notes a 7.2g lead bullet stopped in a door frame melted completely on impact. Assuming the bullet was shot at RT (20C) what would the investigator calculate as the minimum nozzle velocity of the gun to be? (C_lead = 130J/kg*C), (L_lead = 2.5*10^4J/kg) Lead melts at 327C


Homework Equations


Q = mc(delta)T
K = 1/2*m*v^2 (?)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the objective of this problem is to use the energy to determine the velocity. I found that Q = 287.4J. I'm not sure what to do from here, however. If I multiply 2.5*10^4J/kg by 0.0072kg, I get 180J. Do I subtract this from 287.4J, and use the result to calculate velocity? Is the difference kinetic energy? I'm not sure if I'm on the right track here. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the total energy needed to melt the bullet? Remember, it has to be first heated up to the melting point, and the total energy is equal to energy needed to heat it and then melt it. This energy has to come from the kinetic energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top