How Fast Must Earth Spin for Zero Gravity at the Equator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allandra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Force
Allandra
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

By considering the centripetal force acting on a man, calculate the minimum period of rotation that the Earth would need to have about its axis if a man at the equator were to experience zero normal contact force.
Take radius of Earth=6400km

2. The attempt at a solution
this means the g=Fc(centripetral force)
to find v= square root of ( radius of the Earth and g)
g=9.81 N/kg and then sub it to T= (2pie x radius of Earth )/v
Where is the error? Does a zero normal force means the person is experiencing weightlessness due to a=g?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allandra said:
this means the g=Fc(centripetral force)
OK, but you mean mg = Fc.
to find v= square root of ( radius of the Earth and g)
g=9.81 N/kg and then sub it to T= (2pie x radius of Earth )/v
Where is the error?
I don't see any error. What your final expression for T?
Does a zero normal force means the person is experiencing weightlessness due to a=g?
Yes, that's what "weightlessness" means.
 
. where radius of the Earth is 6400km
But I can't get the ans=1.41hrs
I can only get 84.3hrs
square root of{Rg}=square root of (6400km X 35.3km/h)= 475
(R multiply by 2pie)divide by T= 40212/T
cross multiply them and I get 84.3hrs. Do u know where is the error?
 
Allandra said:
square root of{Rg}=square root of (6400km X 35.3km/h)= 475
When you converted g from m/s^2 to km/h^2, you made an error.

Instead, use standard units: meters and seconds, not km and hours. g = 9.8 m/s^2

When you find the answer in seconds, then convert to hours.
 
Last edited:
Thx Doc Al!:smile::biggrin:
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top