How Fast Will You Hit the Ground on a Planet with Reduced Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flinze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Planet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a jumper falling on a planet with reduced gravity, specifically 65% of Earth's gravity. Participants express frustration over consistently obtaining incorrect answers, with values ranging from 0.441 m/s to 0.487 m/s, largely due to variations in the gravitational constant used (9.8 vs. 9.81 m/s²). The importance of significant figures and the correct interpretation of velocity versus speed is emphasized, as well as the potential for confusion if negative values are mistakenly applied. Ultimately, it is noted that the choice of gravitational constant significantly affects the final speed calculation, and using the standard value of 9.81 m/s² is recommended for consistency. The conversation highlights the critical nature of precision in physics calculations and the impact of minor variations in constants.
Flinze
Messages
23
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


You are touring a distant planet on which the magnitude of the free-fall acceleration is 65.0 % of what it is on Earth. For a little excitement, you jump off a precipice 500 m above the planet's surface. After 5.00 s of free fall, you ignite the jet-pack on your back, changing your acceleration to some new, constant value for the remainder of the fall. You reach the ground 26.0 s after igniting the jet-pack.
At what speed do you hit the ground?

Homework Equations


d=vt+1/2at^2
v=vi+at

The Attempt at a Solution


oykPOpI.jpg


Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? I've entered this onto my homework website, but it's telling me my answer is wrong, or perhaps I've might've missed something. I've retried this question multiple times, first time getting 0.441 m/s, second time entering 0.449 m/s. I'm on my last few tries, and every time I enter a wrong answer I lose marks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm pretty sure your thought process is correct, the problem here is probably significant figures, rounding mistakes or using "wrong" values for constants (g)...
first check the problem to see if it states amount of significant figures you should use, then check if you are using your teachers preferred value for g (some use 9.8 other 9.81 other 10)
lastly don't punch in any values until the very end, make sure you use the calculator's answer recall for every operation, minimizing any number rounding induced mistake
in the end replace the value(s) you got (into yoir equations) to see if it is consistent with the problem.
 
WrongMan said:
i'm pretty sure your thought process is correct, the problem here is probably significant figures, rounding mistakes or using "wrong" values for constants (g)...
first check the problem to see if it states amount of significant figures you should use, then check if you are using your teachers preferred value for g (some use 9.8 other 9.81 other 10)
lastly don't punch in any values until the very end, make sure you use the calculator's answer recall for every operation, minimizing any number rounding induced mistake
in the end replace the value(s) you got (into yoir equations) to see if it is consistent with the problem.

I followed all that, answer is still wrong, as it comes to 0.448 m/s even without rounding numbers at all throughout the problem. The velocity should be positive, correct?
 
Flinze said:
I followed all that, answer is still wrong, as it comes to 0.448 m/s even without rounding numbers at all throughout the problem. The velocity should be positive, correct?
The speed was asked, it can not be negative.
0.448 m/s should be correct.
 
ehild said:
The speed was asked, it can not be negative.
0.448 m/s should be correct.
it can be negative (if velocity was asked). if you take the downward y direction as negative, he would arrive with negative velocity. maybe that is the problem here, your teacher assumed you would take gravity acceleration as negative since its downwards, and the new jetpack acceleration as positive since its upwards.
if that is to be the case I would take it up with the teacher to ensure you don't lose any marks because there is absolutely nothing wrong in choosing downward direction as postive
it would be a big mistake on your teacher's side to ask for speed wanting velocity.

anyway, have you tried reversing the steps? i mean, using the values you got does it trace back to 500m height cliff?
 
Last edited:
Flinze said:
I followed all that, answer is still wrong, as it comes to 0.448 m/s even without rounding numbers at all throughout the problem. The velocity should be positive, correct?
The velocity should be positive, to be consistent with your overall choice of signs. (Downward velocity, acceleration and displacement were all positive in your work.)

The resulting velocity at impact is quite sensitive to the value you use for g.

A value of g = 9.8 m/s2 gives a velocity of 0.487 m/s at ground level.

The very crude value of g = 10 m/s2 gives a velocity of -0.288 m/s at ground level. That's an upward velocity which at first puzzled me. It corresponds to having a sufficiently deep hole for you to fall into, rather than impacting the ground. You will descend into the hole and then rise to ground level 26 seconds after deploying the jet-pack. With no hole, you would impact the ground in less than 26 seconds.
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
The velocity should be positive, to be consistent with your overall choice of signs. (Downward velocity, acceleration and displacement were all positive in your work.)

The resulting velocity at impact is quite sensitive to the value you use for g.

A value of g = 9.8 m/s2 gives a velocity of 0.487 m/s at ground level.

The very crude value of g = 10 m/s2 gives a velocity of -0.288 m/s at ground level. That's an upward velocity which at first puzzled me. It corresponds to having a sufficiently deep hole for you to fall into, rather than impacting the ground. You will descend into the whole and then rise to ground level 26 seconds after deploying the jet-pack. With no hole, you would impact the ground in less than 26 seconds.

Oh, I used 9.81 as my gravity, perhaps that may have effected my answer. Though I still haven't checked with my prof. Thanks for your input though.
 
I get 0.4478 with g=9.81 m/s^2 (WolframAlpha query), within three significant figures that agrees with the two values posted here.

With g=10 m/s^2 the solution is a negative velocity which does not make sense - you have to go below ground level within those 26 seconds - so clearly you should not use 10.
 
Alright so my teacher gave us the solution to this problem, and instead of using 9.81 m/s^2, she first solved the problem with symbols and afterwards she plugged everything in while using g=9.8 m/s^2 instead of 9.81 m/s^2, which made a quite a difference in numbers. Though I will check with her if using 9.81 is fine cause it should be and the data given is all in 3 sig figs, so I decided to use 9.81 since that has 3 sig figs in which I could get my answer to have 3 sig figs. So in which her final answer came to be 0.486 m/s^2.
 
  • #10
Back
Top