How Fx = F(4/5) in this diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benjamin_harsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how to calculate the magnitude of Fx in relation to a force vector F and its components. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly defining the angle θ, noting that it can be between F and Fx or F and Fy. The correct formula for Fx is identified as Fx = |F|cos(θ) when θ is defined as the angle between F and Fx. There is also a suggestion that the confusion may stem from a misunderstanding of the mathematical concepts rather than the physics itself. Consistency in angle definition is crucial for accurate calculations.
Benjamin_harsh
Messages
211
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
How Fx = F(4/5) in this diagram?
Relevant Equations
Fx = F(4/5)
243854


##Fx = F\frac{4}{5}##

How Fx = F(4/5) in this diagram?

I am confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine that you are given an angle between the ##\vec{F}## and ##\vec{F_y}## instead of the small triangle in the diagram. How would you calculate the magnitude of ##\vec{F_x}##?

Then, can you find a way how to get this angle from the small triangle shown in the diagram?
 
If I am not mistaken, I would say ##\vec{F_x} = F_x.cos\theta##
Any one would be correct.
 
Last edited:
Benjamin_harsh said:
If I am not mistaken, I would say ##\vec{F_x} = F_x.sin\theta## or ##\vec{F_x} = F_x.cos\theta##
Any one would be correct.

You are mistaken.

First of all, you need to DEFINE where this "θ" is. There are at least 2 angles there, one made between F and Fx, the other between F and Fy.

If θ is the angle between F and Fx, then

Fx = |F|cos θ

BTW, it appears that you are having a lot of problem with math. This really isn't a physics question. This is not meant as a put-down, but rather to make you realize the source of your problems so that you may want to do something about it. Many of my students think that physics is tough, when what they are having problems with is not the physics, but the math. It seems that you are in the same situation.

Zz.
 
Benjamin_harsh said:
If I am not mistaken, I would say
Any one would be correct.

I suggested the angle between ##\vec{F}## and ##\vec{F_y}## for a reason: I think it is easier to spot the same angle in the small triangle (just imagine that you can slide the triangle along the ##\vec{F}## toward the origin). But as already said, you can pick any of the angles, you just must stay consistent with your definition.
Also be careful "x" points vertically and "y" horizontally, that is a bit unconventional.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top