How high does a pendulum go after pushing at equilibrium?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LightningBolt226
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Pendulum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a pendulum when an external force is applied at its equilibrium position. Participants explore how to calculate the height the pendulum will reach after being pushed with a specified force, considering factors like torque and energy changes. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and mathematical approaches related to the application of force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to calculate the height of the pendulum after applying a force, suggesting that the problem may involve complex interactions with gravity and torque.
  • Another participant proposes integrating the force over the displacement to determine the energy increase, which could then be translated into a new height for the pendulum.
  • There is uncertainty about the limits of integration and the definition of the push force versus position, with questions raised about whether the force is constant and where it is applied on the pendulum.
  • A later reply introduces the idea that if the force is applied instantaneously, it complicates the situation, potentially requiring a free body diagram to analyze the forces during the pendulum's motion.
  • Participants discuss the implications of applying force over a small angle versus an instantaneous application, with one asserting that there is no true instantaneous force, emphasizing that there is always a non-zero time during which the force acts.
  • Mathematical relationships involving acceleration, average speed, and work done are suggested as methods to analyze the problem, along with a reference to impulse momentum as a relevant concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the force application, with some suggesting it can be treated as instantaneous while others argue against this notion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to model the situation accurately.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions about the nature of the force application (instantaneous vs. over time) and the need for clarity on the path of the pendulum during the force application. The discussion also highlights the complexity introduced by gravitational torque and the need for precise definitions of variables involved.

LightningBolt226
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Usually, the pendulum problems I encounter relate to initial velocity. What happens if, at equilibrium, I push a pendulum with a certain amount of force? (E.g. 10N) Is there a way to calculate how high the pendulum will go? I guess it's complicated considering torque done by gravity, etc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LightningBolt226 said:
Usually, the pendulum problems I encounter relate to initial velocity. What happens if, at equilibrium, I push a pendulum with a certain amount of force? (E.g. 10N) Is there a way to calculate how high the pendulum will go? I guess it's complicated considering torque done by gravity, etc
Integrate the force through the position displacement -- that will give you an energy increase, which you can translate into a higher zero velocity pause position. Makes sense?
 
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. What are the limits of integration for this case?
 
LightningBolt226 said:
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. What are the limits of integration for this case?
It's a path integral, from the start of the push to the end of the push. How is the push force versus position defined in this problem? Is the push force constant over some arc length? Where on the pendulum is the push force applied?
 
Sorry, I forgot to mention earlier. Suppose that it was an instantaneous force that was applied. Also, suppose that the pendulum is a point mass and is where the force is applied.
 
Actually, this may be a more complicated situation than just a path integral. If the force is applied for more than a very small angle near the bottom of the pendulum's travel, it may require a free body diagram of the forces on the pendulum mass during its travel. I'll flag this thread for the PF Science Advisers to have a look at...
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I realize it might be complicated so I was wondering first about the situation wherein the application of the force was hypothetically instantaneous at the equilibrium position.
 
LightningBolt226 said:
Sorry, I forgot to mention earlier. Suppose that it was an instantaneous force that was applied. Also, suppose that the pendulum is a point mass and is where the force is applied.
That simplifies the problem a lot. But there is no such think as an instantaneous force. It can be applied over a small angle of the pendulum's travel, which makes the force*distance = change in energy approach a lot easier. Can you show us that math?
 
LightningBolt226 said:
Sorry, I forgot to mention earlier. Suppose that it was an instantaneous force that was applied. Also, suppose that the pendulum is a point mass and is where the force is applied.
There is no such thing as an instaneous application of force. It may not be very long, but there's always some non-zero time between the moment when we start applying the force and the moment when we stop.

If that time is very short, then it's a good approximation to say that the pendulum bob moves in a straight line and then: ##F=ma## gives us the acceleration; ##v=at## gives us the final speed; ##v_{ave}=v/2## is the average speed; ##d=tv_{ave}## is the distance the force is applied; and now we can get the energy from ##W=Fd##.

Also, you will want to google for "impulse momentum" to see another standard way of handling problems in which a force is applied for a very short time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K