How High Does Jane Swing on the Vine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter d.tran103
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Jane runs at 5.5 m/s and grabs a vine hanging 4.3 m from a tree. The discussion focuses on calculating how high she can swing upward using the principles of potential energy (Pe) and kinetic energy (Ke). The calculation shows that she swings up to a height of approximately 1.5 m above her starting point, or 2.8 m below the top of the vine. There is uncertainty about the accuracy of this result, with the poster considering the possibility of a different gravitational constant affecting the outcome. The final conclusion is that Jane swings up to a height of 1.5 m, but this answer was not accepted, prompting further inquiry with the professor.
d.tran103
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Jane, looking for Tarzan, is running at top speed (5.5 m/s) and grabs a vine hanging 4.3 m vertically from a tall tree in the jungle. How high can she swing upward?


Homework Equations


Pe=mgh and Ke=1/2mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Can someone tell me if I'm doing this correctly? I have one submission left.
So Pe becomes converted to Ke at the bottom of the swing. And then Ke at the bottom of the swing becomes converted back to Pe. Pe at release is 0 since the vine is hanging vertically. So I have Pe(initial)*0+Ke(initial)=Pe(final) or Ke(initial)=Pe(final)

1/2*m*vi^2=m*g*hf
1/2*vi^2=g*hf
1/2*5.5^2=9.8*hf
hf=1.54337 m.

Height swung upwards=hi-hf
h=4.3-1.54337=2.8 m

Is this correct? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well Jane will swing up to a point 1.5 m vertically above her start point. Or 2.8m below the top of the vine. So how high does she swing up?
 
Okay thanks. My first answer was 1.5 however, it wasn't accepted. I'm thinking that the logarithm is using some weird value for g? I'll just ask my professor. Thanks again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top