How High Was the Stone When It Started Falling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the height from which a stone fell before passing a 2.2m tall window in 0.28 seconds. The initial attempt at solving the problem involved determining the velocity at the top of the window and using kinematic equations. However, a critical error was identified regarding the sign of the displacement, which should be negative since the stone is falling downwards. Correcting this leads to a reevaluation of the calculations. Ultimately, the stone is determined to have been dropped from a height of 4.3m above the top of the window.
joe215
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A falling stone takes 0.28s to travel past a window 2.2m tall. From what height above the top of the window did the stone fall?

The Attempt at a Solution



Vo=?, the velocity at the top of the window
a= -9.8m/s^2
t=.28s
d=2.2m
v=?

Vo=(1/2at^2-d)/-t

[1/2(-9.8)(.28)^2-2.2]/-.28=9.2m/s

Vo now becomes V although it still represents the velocity at the top of the window.

t=?
d=?
a=9.8 m/s^2
Vo=0
V=9.2m/s

Solve for "D"

D=(V^2-Vo^2)/2a

(9.2^2 - 0)/ (2*-9.8)= -4.3m

The ball is dropped from 4.3m.

Am I right?

Thanks,

Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi joe215,

joe215 said:

Homework Statement



A falling stone takes 0.28s to travel past a window 2.2m tall. From what height above the top of the window did the stone fall?

The Attempt at a Solution



Vo=?, the velocity at the top of the window
a= -9.8m/s^2
t=.28s
d=2.2m
v=?

Vo=(1/2at^2-d)/-t

[1/2(-9.8)(.28)^2-2.2]/-.28=9.2m/s

This value cannot be right; the object is moving downwards so the velocity must be negative.

The equation before this last one is right, but when you plugged in the numbers you made an error. Do you see what it is?
 


I don't see the error?
 


joe215 said:
I don't see the error?

d is the displacement; since the stone is falling downwards, d is equal to -2.2m.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top