How i should proceed after reading Boas' book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andreol263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boas Book Reading
AI Thread Summary
After finishing Boas, several recommendations for advancing mathematical physics include Don Koks' "Explorations in Mathematical Physics," which offers valuable insights but lacks problem sets, and Frankel's "Geometry of Physics" for a deeper understanding of tensors. While some participants appreciate the structured approach of Boas, they suggest that studying relevant physics texts may suffice for mastering advanced topics like General Relativity, Condensed Matter, and Electromagnetic Theory. The discussion emphasizes the importance of engaging with problems selectively, focusing on those that introduce new methods or concepts. Overall, a combination of mathematical insights and practical physics applications is deemed essential for further learning.
Andreol263
Messages
77
Reaction score
15
I'm on final of the chapter 7 yet, but i want to know when i finish this book, which book i should get to continue to learn the math necessary to more advance topics(GR, Condensed Matter, EM Theory(Jackson level), Analytic Mechanics and others..)? and if exists a book like Boas i would be so happy, i LOVE this book, the first chapter is VERY boring, but from the section of Power Series Expansion and so on it's very interesting,i would recommend to everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you reading the book as a novel, or actually working through the many problems?
 
After Boas, I studied Don Koks' Explorations in Mathematical Physics. It's a very good book, but a couple of caveats:

(1) There are no problems to be worked, it isn't a textbook. The value is that the book is stuffed with valuable insights about the mathematical language underlying physics.

(2) This book takes a somewhat unorthodox approach toward tensors, avoiding the use of one-forms. It would be good to follow up later with, say, at least the first part of Frankel's Geometry of Physics.
 
I'm working through the problems yes, but not all the problems, for example: in the exercises exists certain problems that make you use the SAME method many times, that problems i make only one of them, but for problems that take in other methods or need to use derive a something, certainly i will do these problems.
 
Andreol263 said:
I'm on final of the chapter 7 yet, but i want to know when i finish this book, which book i should get to continue to learn the math necessary to more advance topics(GR, Condensed Matter, EM Theory(Jackson level), Analytic Mechanics and others..)? and if exists a book like Boas i would be so happy, i LOVE this book, the first chapter is VERY boring, but from the section of Power Series Expansion and so on it's very interesting,i would recommend to everyone!

https://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Is currently what I'm working through. There is overlap with Boa's here, but other topics are more developed. It's also cheap, which is a plus.

Honestly though, if you study the topics above from a physics text that should be more than sufficient, as no math methods book is going to cover every mathematical topic needed to do all the above.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top