How is a Conservation of Energy Problem Solved?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a conservation of energy problem involving a box moving on an incline with friction. Participants clarify the potential energy (PE) calculation, emphasizing the importance of the height difference in the energy equation. The correct PE term is established as mg(h + Lsin30) due to the box's initial position on a flat surface before ascending the incline. A discrepancy in calculated speeds using kinematics and energy methods is addressed, revealing an oversight in accounting for friction's work. The issue is resolved by incorporating the coefficient of kinetic friction into the energy equation, leading to consistent results.
bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
problem solved. Thanks!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance I see one error in your energy equation.

In the potential term you need the height difference, which is:

(Lsin30) not (h + Lsin30)
 
Last edited:
Hello:

But point A is on the ground, even below the beginning of the friction part. So wouldn't the potential different be (h + Lsin30)?
Thanks.
 
Its hard to tell what you mean since I can't see the image yet, but from your description the frictional part if the path is on the incline, correct?

If so to find the change in PE, you need the change in height caused by sliding from A to B. This is Lsin30. Draw a picture and see for yourself.

Of course, I could be thinking of some different set up to this problem. Its hard to tell without the image.
 
Hello:

Sorry, so the box is on the flat part at the beginning. Point A is there. Then, the incline is initially frictionless up to a vertical height h, and then the friction part begins. The friction part has length L. So if I were to start from the flat part, wouldn't the change in PE = mg(h + Lsin30)? (because the box has to climb up a height h first to reach the friction part). Thanks.
 
bodensee9 said:
Hello:

Sorry, so the box is on the flat part at the beginning. Point A is there. Then, the incline is initially frictionless up to a vertical height h, and then the friction part begins. The friction part has length L. So if I were to start from the flat part, wouldn't the change in PE = mg(h + Lsin30)? (because the box has to climb up a height h first to reach the friction part). Thanks.

OK right. Then you have the correct PE term. The answers should come out to be the same.

So, next step. What are the two different answers your getting? I'll have an easier time finding your mistake if I can see the answers that your getting.
 
Hello:

So, doing the old kinematics way, I got 3.5 m/s. But doing it the energy way, I have:
1/2*m*8^2 = m*9.8*(2 + .75sin30) + 1/2*m*v^2 + m*9.8*cos30*.75. which comes out to be around 2.17?? Thanks.
 
bodensee9 said:
Hello:

So, doing the old kinematics way, I got 3.5 m/s. But doing it the energy way, I have:
1/2*m*8^2 = m*9.8*(2 + .75sin30) + 1/2*m*v^2 + m*9.8*cos30*.75. which comes out to be around 2.17?? Thanks.

Your set-up of the problem is correct and your understanding of the physics is excellent. Good job!

Your problem is in the execution of your approach, in the section I bolded above. The work done by friction is
= F * \Delta r,

= \muk * n * \Delta r

= (0.4) * m (9.8 m/s2) * cos30 * (0.75 m)

You forgot to use the coeeficient of kinetic friction in your equation, to find the work done by the force of friction.

Try that, and see if you get the exact same answer both ways.
 
Oh thanks! That took care of the problem!
 
Back
Top