How Is a Nonlinear Equation Linearized in FEM Software?

aamirmub
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to understand an example from a FEM software manual. The manual mentions a nonlinear equation http://aamir-pc:2080/v6.9/books/exa/graphics/exa_eqn00137.gif and this equation is linearized to obtain http://aamir-pc:2080/v6.9/books/exa/graphics/exa_eqn00152.gif .[/URL] Can anyone please explain how this has been done?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to fix your messages. The two equations don't show up.
 
The nonlinear equation is Y= G^(-1) * X + a * X^3 where G and a are constants. The linearized equation is Y(i+1) = (G^(-1) + a * X(i)^2) * X(i+1) where i and i+1 are superscripts.
 
The first thing done is factor out an "X": Y= (G-1+ aX2)X. The next thing done was convert to a recursive form by treating the separate "X"s as if they were different terms in a sequence: Yi+1= (G-1+ aXi2)Xi+1. Given a starting value, X1, you could then calculate a sequence of "Y"s. If that sequence convertes, then Y= \lim_{i\to\infty}Y^i will satisfy that equation: \lim_{i\to \infty} Y^i= (G^{-1}+ a(\lim_{i\to\infty}X^i)^2)(\lim_{i\to\infty}X^{i+1}) and, since "Xi" and "Xi+1" refer to the same sequence they both converge to the same limit, X.
 
Thank you for your reply. Is the linearization carried out using the first two terms of the taylor series in incremental form?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top