How Is Kinetic Energy Calculated and Converted into Electrical Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic energy of a 1.006 kg metal sphere dropped from 2.5 meters can be calculated using gravitational potential energy (PE = mgh), which converts entirely to kinetic energy (KE) upon impact. The potential energy at the height of 2.5 meters is approximately 24.6 joules, equating to the kinetic energy just before hitting the ground. This kinetic energy is the same as the mechanical energy in this scenario, as it encompasses both potential and kinetic forms. A 1000 watt generator operating at 95% efficiency would require about 1053 joules of mechanical energy to produce 1000 joules of electrical energy. Therefore, understanding these energy conversions is crucial for determining how many spheres need to be dropped per second to power the generator effectively.
mailhiot
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If a metal sphere that weights 1.006 kg is dropped from 2.5 meters, what is it's kinetic energy when it hits the ground?

Is this kinetic energy the same value as mechanical energy?

If this kinetic energy was converted in electrical energy by a 1000 watt electric generator that was 95% efficient, how much mechanical energy (in joules) is required? In other words, does a 1000 watt generator require 1000 joules of mechanical energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mailhiot said:
If a metal sphere that weights 1.006 kg is dropped from 2.5 meters, what is it's kinetic energy when it hits the ground?

Is this kinetic energy the same value as mechanical energy?

If this kinetic energy was converted in electrical energy by a 1000 watt electric generator that was 95% efficient, how much mechanical energy (in joules) is required? In other words, does a 1000 watt generator require 1000 joules of mechanical energy?

In this case, what you want to do is apply conservation of energy—in other words, total mechanical energy will always be conserved. Use that principal, and potential & kinetic energy to answer your question.
 
Thank you for the answer, but I am not a physics person so don't really understand the answer. So in my question, with a metal sphere that is 1.006 kg dropped from 2.5 meters, what is the potential energy, kinetic energy, and mechanical energy? I need to know this value because I need to know how many spheres need to be dropped per second to power a 1000 watt electric generator. THANKS!
 
OK, some background info then.
The mechanical energy is the total energy the object posseses from position and from motion. This will always be conserved.

Potential energy is energy from position. GRAVITATIONAL potential energy is the potential energy that gravity causes, and is given by PE= mgh, where m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to garvity (9.8 m/s^2), and h is the height. You have all these values.

Kinetic energy is the energy due to motion, and is given by KE= 0.5 m v^2, where m is mass and v is velocity.

Now ask yourself, before the sphere is dropped, what is it's kinetic energy? Since it's velocity is 0, logically it has no kinetic energy. However, it has gravitational potential energy, which you can calculate.
Since mechanical energy is potential energy and kinetic energy. then the GPE in this scenario makes up all the mechanical energy.

Remember that all the mechanical energy will be conserved. At 0 m, all of it will be kinetic energy.
Hopefully, I've given you something to think about!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top