How Is Maximum Resistance Calculated in a Superconducting Ring Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrew410
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum resistance in a superconducting lead ring experiment, referencing S. C. Collins' findings from 1955 to 1958, where a current persisted for 2.5 years without loss. The sensitivity of the experiment is defined as 1 part in 10^9, indicating that the current's decay must remain below this threshold. Participants clarify the use of the equation I(t) = I_0 e^(-Rt/L) and how to derive resistance from it, emphasizing the need to substitute the decay ratio with the sensitivity limit. Algebraic manipulation leads to the expression R = (L/t)(1 - I/I_0), with corrections made regarding unit consistency. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of a misunderstanding in the calculations, reinforcing the importance of accurate substitutions in the equations.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
The resistance of a superconductor. In an experiment carried out by S. C. Collins between 1955 and 1958, a current was maintained in a superconducting lead ring for 2.50 yr with no observed loss. If the inductance of the ring was 4.44*10^(-8) H, and the sensitivity of the experiment was 1 part in 10^9, what was the maximum resistance of the ring? (Suggestion: Treat this as a decaying current in an RL circuit, and recall that e^(-x) = 1-x for small x.)

I know that I = ((emf)/R)*(1-e^(-Rt/L)). How do I get the maximum resistance from this? Also, what does the sensitivity of the experiment mean?
Any help would be great! thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use I(t) = I_0 e^{-Rt/L} instead, as the problem suggested, for small x, e^(-x) = 1-x
I(t) = I_0 (1-Rt/L))
I_0 - I(t) = Rt/L
the sensitivity is 1 part in 10^9 implies
\frac{I_0-I(t)}{I_0} < 10^{-9}
the rest is simple algebra
 
so,
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})
and \frac{I} {I_0} < 10^{-9}.
Do I substitute \frac{I} {I_0} with 1^(-9)?
 
andrew410 said:
so,
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})
and \frac{I} {I_0} < 10^{-9}.
Do I substitute \frac{I} {I_0} with 1^(-9)?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
you substitute the whole \frac{I_0-I} {I_0} with 10^-9
 
wait a minute, where did R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0}) came from?
The unit is not even correct... how did you get this?
 
I(t) = I_0 e^{-Rt/L}
I(t) = I_0 (1-Rt/L)
\frac{I(t)}{I_0} = 1-Rt/L
\frac{Rt} {L} = 1-\frac{I} {I_0}
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})

am I wrong?
and then
\frac{I_0-I} {I_0}
simplifies to -\frac{I} {I_0} so -\frac{I} {I_0}<10^{-9}
 
Last edited:
oh yeah, you are right, my mistake
 
Back
Top