How is Maximum Sustained Speed Calculated for a Car Driving Up an Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniellionyang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum sustained speed of a car driving up a 30-degree incline, given specific parameters such as torque, power output, and mass. The solution derives the speed using the formula v = 2P/mg, while ignoring frictional losses due to the problem's assumptions. Participants clarify that static friction between the wheels and the road does not impede the car's motion in this scenario, as it is necessary for rolling without slipping. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding when to consider friction in real-world applications, particularly in different conditions like low friction surfaces. Overall, the problem simplifies calculations for educational purposes, emphasizing theoretical understanding over practical complexities.
daniellionyang
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
This is from the 2014 F=ma exam:
The maximum torque output from the engine of a new experimental car of mass m is τ. The maximum rotational speed of the engine is ω. The engine is designed to provide a constant power output P. The engine is connected to the wheels via a perfect transmission that can smoothly trade torque for speed with no power loss. The wheels have a radius R, and the coefficient of static friction between the wheels and the road is μ.

What is the maximum sustained speed v the car can drive up a 30 degree incline? Assume no frictional losses and assume μ is large enough so that the tires do not slip.

The solution is as follows:
The fundamental idea is P = Fv where F is the component of the weight parallel to the incline. Then
v = P/mg sin θ Since θ = 30◦, the answer is v = 2P/mg.

Why does the solution ignore the effects of friction when calculating F. Shouldn't F=mgsin(theta)+mu*Fn?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-12-22 at 6.38.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-12-22 at 6.38.07 PM.png
    72.6 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
The vehicle is rolling up the hill, not sliding up it.
 
So, in rolling without slipping, even if there is friction, we ignore it? (this means it doesn't affect the net force right?)
 
It depends on exactly what/where the friction is, but either way, in this case you were instructed to ignore it. The assumptions provided to you may or may not reflect how such problems are done in the real world: they are done to make it easier for you to solve the problem when you are learning it.
 
Thanks! You mentioned that we ignore it "in this case." Are there any cases where we do not ignore this friction?
 
daniellionyang said:
Thanks! You mentioned that we ignore it "in this case." Are there any cases where we do not ignore this friction?
The friction between the wheels and road? The problem states the criteria for why in this case it could be ignored. Flip that over...
 
daniellionyang said:
So, in rolling without slipping, even if there is friction, we ignore it? (this means it doesn't affect the net force right?)

I'm wondering if you misunderstand something... The friction mentioned in this problem is "static friction between the wheels and the road". Static friction doesn't act to slow the car down. Are you confusing this with rolling resistance or air drag?

The problem statement says two separate things..
daniellionyang said:
Assume no frictional losses...

They mean ignore things like friction in the transmission, rolling resistance and air drag etc. Those would affect the net force on the car.

...and assume μ is large enough so that the tires do not slip.

You want high static friction between a tyre and the road to stop the wheels spinning. This is why drag racers like a nice sticky surface. If μ was low (eg ice) you would have to calculate if the static friction limited the amount of torque that could be applied at the wheels. In that case the max velocity would be slower or even zero... or even negative..

 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Back
Top