How Is Speed Calculated on a Zip Line?

AI Thread Summary
Speed on a zip line is influenced by the cable's angle and tension, which can complicate calculations due to the catenary curve formed by the cable. The tension from the rider's weight may distort the catenary shape, affecting the dynamics as they travel. An energy-based approximation is suggested as a simpler method to estimate speed, particularly when neglecting cable weight. However, the actual motion is complex and may require more detailed analysis. Safety considerations are emphasized throughout the discussion.
oferar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello. I want to build a small zip line. Basically it is a steel cable anchored in two points with a different height in each anchor. Then you travel along the cable from the highest anchor to the lowest with the help of a pulley to reduce friction.
I found that the cable form a Catenary curve, there are ways to figure the maximum force at each of the anchors, but could not find out how to find the speed at each point of the cable. Basically the cable’s angle should work the speed, but also the cable tension should influence the speed. Do you know how can this speed be calculated or estimated, assuming frictionless displacements, etc?

Tanks very much.
Regards;
Fernando.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif Hi, oferar!

This sounds an interesting analysis. though quite beyond me. But will the tension be such that the load (i.e., the person) will distort the original catenary shape significantly? It so, I think this is going to add a major complication to the analysis in that the shape will be in constant change as you travel along. :rolleyes:

Good luck, https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon14.gif and keep safety uppermost!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NascentOxygen said:
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif Hi, oferar!

This sounds an interesting analysis. though quite beyond me. But will the tension be such that the load (i.e., the person) will distort the original catenary shape significantly? It so, I think this is going to add a major complication to the analysis in that the shape will be in constant change as you travel along. :rolleyes:

Good luck, https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon14.gif and keep safety uppermost!

Thanks, yes, the shape of the curve will be modified all the time. Seems that if the weight of the cable is not taken into account, I’ll move through an elliptic path, and the cable will form a triangle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a first shot at this, I would suggest using an energy based approximation to the motion. The exaction motion, including cable weight, is likely to be extremely complicated, but neglecting the cable weight, it may be that an energy approach will be forth coming.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
21K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top