How Is Tension Calculated in a Rope During Rock Climbing?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tension in a rope during rock climbing, specifically when a climber is in equilibrium at a 40-degree angle to the horizontal. Participants analyze the relationship between weight (W) and tension (T), with some confusion regarding the correct formula, as one source suggests T = W sin 40° while others argue it should be T = W / sin 40°. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the angle of the rock face and the role of friction in determining the correct tension. A free body diagram is recommended to visualize the forces at play, but there is disagreement on the assumptions made in the problem statement. Ultimately, the discussion reveals complexities in applying theoretical physics to real-world climbing scenarios.
LostAce
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 65kg rock climber is abseiling down a rock, consider the situation when he's in equilibrium and standing at an angle on the surface of the rock, hanging from a rope.

The rope is at an angle of 40 degrees to the horizontal, calculate the tension in the rope

Homework Equations


W = mg.
Knowledge about components of forces.

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a free body diagram of the climber and used Newton's Third Law to form a right triangle with the tension as the hypotenuse which led me to sin 40 = W/T so T = W/sin 40. but the solution states that T = W sin 40 I don't understand why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be possible for you to provide a diagram? It's a little hard to picture the system you are describing.

Chet
 
Foto am 25.09.15 um 1.46 vorm..jpg
 
If angle of the rock face is unspecified, there doesn't seem to be enough information provided to solve the problem.

Chet
 
The question does not contain enough information to yield a unique solution, however given the solution T = W sin 40° you can infer that the rock face is vertical and that the climber forms a right angle with the rope. T = W / sin 40° implies that the climber forms a right angle with the wall. If the wall were not vertical (as you have drawn) it gets more complicated.

Bad question.
 
As you say '' you can infer that the rock face is vertical and that the climber forms a right angle with the rope" let's assume all the conditions you mentioned were a given, then how would you go about solving the problem i.e. would there be enough information to solve it?
 
LostAce said:
As you say '' you can infer that the rock face is vertical and that the climber forms a right angle with the rope" let's assume all the conditions you mentioned were a given, then how would you go about solving the problem i.e. would there be enough information to solve it?
Yes, provided there is no friction between the climber's foot and the vertical rock.

Chet
 
And how would you solve it?
 
LostAce said:
And how would you solve it?
The way that you did it originally, and, as you and MrAnchovy showed, the correct answer should be with the sine in the denominator (not the book answer). There is no way that the tension is less the w.

Chet
 
  • #10
Thank you
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
The way that you did it originally, and, as you and MrAnchovy showed, the correct answer should be with the sine in the denominator (not the book answer). There is no way that the tension is less the w.
You can get to the book answer if there is sufficient friction between boot and rock to maintain a contact 50 degrees from horizontal so the climber forms a right angle with the rope. Of course neither this nor the other solution are real world examples of abseiling.
 
  • #12
Can you explain how ( if that were the case)? Even with this condition I still don't understand how the (book) solution came to be.
 
  • #13
I read the problem a bit differently. I suggest the rope is parallel to the rock face and that the climber is standing perpendicularly to the rock face. If you assume the rope is tied to the climber at mass centre then you can show friction does not enter into it.
 
  • #14
Yeah but the rope has to make a 40 degree angle with the horizontal.
 
  • #15
LostAce said:
Can you explain how ( if that were the case)? Even with this condition I still don't understand how the (book) solution came to be.
Draw it, with the (vertical) rock face as the hypotenuse.
 
  • #16
In my judgement, we're all spending too much of our valuable time on this crazy problem statement. I'm outta here.

Chet
 
  • #17
LostAce said:
Yeah but the rope has to make a 40 degree angle with the horizontal.
So make the rock face do the same.
 
  • #18
@MrAnchovy: How do I get the weight component for T = w x sin40? Is this diagram correct?
IMG_1225.JPG
 
  • #19
It's not incorrect, but it's not complete. Extend the rope marked T with a line. Add a line perpendicular to this extension to the tip of the arrow marked W. This triangle shows the components of W along the rope (W sin 40°) and along the body of the abseiler (W cos 40°).
 
  • Like
Likes LostAce
Back
Top