How is Tension Distributed in a Massless Pulley System?

In summary: FBD of the man, try drawing a FBD of the chair and ropes (a FBD that encircles the chair and cuts through both ropes). Oh, welcome to PF!instead of drawing a FBD of the man, try drawing a FBD of the chair and ropes (a FBD that encircles the chair and cuts through both ropes). Oh, welcome to PF!
  • #1
pikapika1
14
0
A small man is sitting in a bosun chair that dangles from a massless rope, which runs over a massless frictionless pulley and back down to the mans hand. The combined mass of the man and the chair is 95kg. with what force magnitude must the man pull on the rope if he is to rise?

Heres a link to a drawing
http://img438.imageshack.us/img438/8349/pulley27xt.png

I'm having troubles drawing the FBD for the man on the chair.
The following is my attempted drawing of FBD of the man.

W down
Fn up, by the chair, equivalent in magnitude of W.

F down, man pulling the rope
Fn up, equal and opposite reaction by the chair

and T up

Someone help me out here pls?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
pikapika1 said:
A small man is sitting in a bosun chair that dangles from a massless rope, which runs over a massless frictionless pulley and back down to the mans hand. The combined mass of the man and the chair is 95kg. with what force magnitude must the man pull on the rope if he is to rise?

Heres a link to a drawing
http://img438.imageshack.us/img438/8349/pulley27xt.png

I'm having troubles drawing the FBD for the man on the chair.
The following is my attempted drawing of FBD of the man.

W down
Fn up, by the chair, equivalent in magnitude of W.

F down, man pulling the rope
Fn up, equal and opposite reaction by the chair

and T up

Someone help me out here pls?
Instead of drawing a FBD of the man, try drawing a FBD of the chair and ropes (a FBD that encircles the chair and cuts through both ropes). Oh, welcome to PF!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
PhanthomJay said:
Instead of drawing a FBD of the man, try drawing a FBD of the chair and ropes (a FBD that encircles the chair and cuts through both ropes). Oh, welcome to PF!

ok so the chair would have

weight downward

and the rope would have
force down and T up

which doesn't makes sense

i'm not understanding this...
help me out
 
  • #4
pikapika1 said:
ok so the chair would have

weight downward
yes, correct
and the rope would have
force down and T up
No. When you draw a FBD, draw a 'cloud' or circle around the portion of the system you wish to analyze. In this case, draw that circle starting around the chair, then encircling beneath the bottom lower rope (hanging beneath the guy's hands), and then cutting through the upper 2 ropes, and closing back to where you started. Wherever that circle cuts through a 'contact' point, there is generally a force applied at that point. And always the non-contact gravity force acts. Note the rope tensions on either side of a massless frictionless pulley are always equal. Then use Newton 1 to solve for T, which is also his pulling force.
 
  • #5
you lost me at when you said drawing a cloud. Is there any logical way to do it without learning new concepts.

so

weight down

force down

2T up, left and right side of the rope to balance the two downward forces to move in a constant velocity?
 
  • #6
pikapika1 said:
you lost me at when you said drawing a cloud. Is there any logical way to do it without learning new concepts.
I always draw a squiggly circle around the piece I'm analyzing. You can draw a smooth circle if you like. Or forget the circle/cloud concept if it confuses you. Personally, I find it difficult to find forces acting on the free body without it, though.
so

weight down
yes
force down
this is where you are in error, what force might this be?
2T up, left and right side of the rope
yes
to balance the two
what's the other one, please explain?
downward forces to move in a constant velocity?
I think you may be assuming a downward tension force from the man puling on the rope? This is not correct when you draw a FBD of the man-chair system. You are looking for the forces acting on the man-chair system. Tension forces always pull away from the objects they act on. There are 2 tension forces acting up on them, and the weight of the man and chair acting down. Solve for T.
 
  • #7
PhanthomJay said:
I think you may be assuming a downward tension force from the man puling on the rope? This is not correct when you draw a FBD of the man-chair system. You are looking for the forces acting on the man-chair system. Tension forces always pull away from the objects they act on. There are 2 tension forces acting up on them, and the weight of the man and chair acting down. Solve for T.

Good hint PhantomJay. I was trying to solve the OP's question as well and got hung until I read this.
 
  • #8
i don't understand how there could be 2 Tensions upward.
Why is it 2T= mg?
where is the extra T coming from

can you explain this in detail

i appreciate your help
 
  • #9
pikapika1 said:
i don't understand how there could be 2 Tensions upward.
Why is it 2T= mg?
where is the extra T coming from

can you explain this in detail

i appreciate your help
I know you don't like the cloud, so let me try to explain without it. We are looking at a free body diagram of the man and chair together. That's the portion we are focusing on. One of the ropes is pulling up on the man (the one he is holding), the other is pulling up on the chair. That's 2T pulling up on the man-chair system. The weight acts down. In FBD's you must look at the forces acting only on the portion you are isolating.
 
  • #10
oh ok thx

if you were to explain in terms of clouds and circles
how would u explain this behavior?
 
  • #11
pikapika1 said:
oh ok thx

if you were to explain in terms of clouds and circles
how would u explain this behavior?
Draw the circle completely around the man-chair and ropes, such that it's circumference 'slices' or cuts through the two top ropes. This is the FBD you are examining for the forces acting on it. In a FBD, you identify all external forces acting on it (such as gravity and any other externally applied forces), and you also identify the internal contact forces acting on it, at the points where the circle 'cuts' through those forces. In this problem, the circle cuts through the 2 top ropes, so you label these unknown forces each as "T" (actually, it could be T1 and T2, respectively, but T1=T2 when the cord passes over a frictionless, massless pulley, so call them each "T".) It doesn't cut through anything else, so the remaining forces are the external ones, in this case, gravity only (the weight of the man and chair). So its 2T up, mg down, or the man need only pull with half his weight to move at constant velocity. This problem is a level of difficulty up from the more simple case of a man just hanging from a rope attached to a ceiling, where for that case, T is simply his weight, mg.
 
  • #12
great explanation :cool:

When we are assigning T's at the two cut points,
if you don't mind, can you also explain why both the T is upwards as opposed to pointing opposite direction? (one up, one down)
 
  • #13
pikapika1 said:
great explanation :cool:

When we are assigning T's at the two cut points,
if you don't mind, can you also explain why both the T is upwards as opposed to pointing opposite direction? (one up, one down)
Remember again, when you are looking at tension forces acting on objects in a FBD, that tension forces must always pull away from that object...the tail of the tension force vector originates at the object, and the arrow points away from it. Since you are looking at the FBD of the tension forces acting on the man and chair, both those forces must pull away from them, that is, they act UP.
I think you are incorrectly envisioning the right rope tension acting down, but visualize this: The man's hands are pulling down on that rope, that should be obvious; thus by Newton's 3rd law, the rope must be pulling up on the man. Same with the rope acting on the chair, it's pulling the chair UP, therefore, it points up, which is a bit more obvious.
 

Related to How is Tension Distributed in a Massless Pulley System?

1. What is a massless pulley?

A massless pulley is a simple machine that consists of a wheel with a grooved rim and a rope or cable wrapped around it. It is used to change the direction of a force and can be either fixed or movable. The term "massless" refers to the assumption that the pulley itself has no mass, allowing it to rotate freely without affecting the system's dynamics.

2. How does a massless pulley work?

A massless pulley works by changing the direction of a force applied to one end of the rope or cable. When a force is applied to one side of the pulley, the tension in the rope causes the other side to move in the opposite direction. This allows for the transfer of force and motion from one object to another without the need for the pulley to have any mass.

3. What are the advantages of using a massless pulley?

The main advantage of using a massless pulley is that it allows for the transfer of force and motion without adding any extra mass to the system. This can be beneficial in situations where minimizing mass and friction is important, such as in mechanical systems and scientific experiments. Massless pulleys are also simple and easy to use, making them a popular choice for many applications.

4. Are there any real-life examples of massless pulleys?

Yes, there are many real-life examples of massless pulleys. Some common examples include flagpoles, cranes, elevators, and exercise equipment. In these cases, the pulleys are used to change the direction of a force or to lift heavy objects. Massless pulleys can also be found in many scientific experiments and demonstrations, such as in physics classes or laboratories.

5. Are massless pulleys truly massless?

No, massless pulleys are not actually massless. The term "massless" is used as an assumption in physics problems to simplify calculations and to focus on the effects of the pulley on the system rather than the pulley itself. In reality, all objects have some mass, and while the mass of a pulley may be negligible compared to other objects in a system, it is not technically massless.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
822
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top