How is the 4-momentum 4-vector defined in relativistic QM?

pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
I've been wondering about relativistic quantum mechanics. Elsewhere I'm addressing some comments about this branch of physics but I have never studied it. Is the 4-momentum 4-vector defined in the same way in relativsitic QM or is there a difference? I'm wondering if the time component of 4-momentum is defined in the same way in relativistic QM as in classical relativity. Thanks.

Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pmb_phy said:
I've been wondering about relativistic quantum mechanics. Elsewhere I'm addressing some comments about this branch of physics but I have never studied it. Is the 4-momentum 4-vector defined in the same way in relativsitic QM or is there a difference? I'm wondering if the time component of 4-momentum is defined in the same way in relativistic QM as in classical relativity. Thanks.

Pete

Yes, generally the metric is (+---), although Weinberg uses (-+++) as in (flat) GR.

In QFT the 4-momentum is typically associated with the phase change rates in the
time and space components corresponding to the plane wave eigenfunctions:

\psi(x)~=~e^{-iEt/\hbar + ipx/\hbar}Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
It's defined as the P^\mu that appears in the translation operator e^{-iP^\mu a_\mu}, where a^\mu is the translation four-vector. This definition works in both relativistic and non-relativistic QM. (The best place to read about these things is chapter 2 of vol. 1 of Weinberg's QFT book).

In a relativistic quantum field theory, you can also construct the four-momentum operators expliclity from the Lagrangian, as the conserved quantities that Noether's theorem tells us must exist due to the invariance of the action under translations in space and time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top