How is the Ideal Gas Law Derived from Temperature and Pressure Relationships?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Ideal Gas Law from the relationships between temperature and pressure. A key point is the manipulation of the equation T' = p2*t1/p1 = v1*t2/v2, leading to the expression PV = KT. The relationship shows that at constant volume, pressure is proportional to temperature, and at constant pressure, volume is proportional to temperature. By dividing the equations, it establishes that the left side is a function of pressure while the right side is a function of volume, indicating a direct relationship. The mathematical conclusion drawn is that p1/t1 = p2/t' and v1/t' = v2/t2.
Kathhhriine
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the question, it was first asked to state the relationship between p1, p2, t1 and t', and v1, v2, t' and t2. This was found to be p1/t1=p2/t' and v1/t'=v2/t2. Further, it is asked to use these relationships to deduce that for an ideal gas PV=KT where K=constant, this is the part i dont understand.
For further understanding of the question, the question states this: "The ideal gas is held in a cylinder by a moveable piston. The pressure of the gas is p1, its volume is V1 and its kelvintemperature is T1. The pressure, volume and temperature are changed to p2, V2and T2 respectively." from p1 t', the volume is kept constant, giving p2, t' v1, and from v1, t', pressure is kept constant, giving v2, t2 and p2.
Relevant Equations
PV=KT
p1/t1=p2/t' and v1/t'=v2/t2
I figured that T' is a common factor for both relationships and from there deduceted that T'=p2xt1/p1=v1xt2/v2. However, I don't understand how that can be further manipulated to PV=KT.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since, at constant volume, pressure is proportional to temperature, you can write $$P=f(V)T$$ and since at constant pressure, volume is proportional to temperature, you can write $$V=g(P)T$$ So, if you divide one equation by the other, you get $$\frac{P}{V}=\frac{f(V)}{g(P)}$$or$$Pg(P)=Vf(V)$$So the left hand side is a function only of pressure and the right hand side is a function only of volume. Mathematically, what is the only way this can happen?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Kathhhriine said:
p1/t1=p2/t' and v1/t'=v2/t2

I figured that T' is a common factor for both relationships and from there deduceted that T'=p2xt1/p1=v1xt2/v2. However, I don't understand how that can be further manipulated to PV=KT.

You have p2xt1/p1=v1xt2/v2 . Divide both sides of the equation by (t1t2) and muliply by (p1v2).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top