How Is the Initial Height h0 Calculated in a Spring Compression Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FallingMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
AI Thread Summary
In the spring compression problem, the initial height h0 of a block released from rest is calculated using energy conservation principles. The potential energy at height h0 (mgh0) is equated to the elastic potential energy stored in the spring (1/2kx^2) and the gravitational potential energy change (mgx) when the spring is compressed. The confusion arises from the interpretation of kinetic energy, which is zero at the top and bottom of the compression, indicating that energy is conserved throughout the motion. The equation mgh0 = 1/2kx^2 - mgx clarifies the relationship between these energies. Understanding that 1/2kx^2 represents elastic potential energy, not kinetic energy, simplifies the analysis of the problem.
FallingMan
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 700 g block is released from rest at height h0 above a ver- tical spring with spring constant k = 400 N/m and negligible mass. The block sticks to the spring and momentarily stops after com- pressing the spring 19.0 cm. What is the value of h0?

Homework Equations



W = 1/2kx^2 where W is the work, k is the spring constant, and x is the distance spring is compressed.

Potential Energy = mgh0 where h0 is the initial height, g is gravitational acceleration, and m is mass.

U0 + KE0 = Uf + KEf , expressing that the kinetic and potential energy before must equal the kinetic and potential energy after.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have the solution for this problem, but I don't really understand it.

At height h0 before release, the block has potential energy and no kinetic energy:
U0 = mgh0

At the contact point between block and spring, the block has some kinetic energy and some potential energy, which will be equal to mgh0.

mgh0 = KE + U

U = mgx, where x is the remaining distance to compress the spring
KE = 1/2mv^2, where v is the velocity of the block upon contact.

I know KE is normally expressed as 1/2mv^2, but the solution shows it as 1/2kx^2.

They make mgh0 = 1/2kx^2 - mgx

This then allows them to calculate the h0. However, I'm confused at how they arrived at that equation (specific questions below):

Why is mgx negative? Why is 1/2kx^2 expressed as the Kinetic energy? I thought 1/2kx^2 is the work done by a spring, not the kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1/2kx^2 is not kinetic energy but it is Elastic Potential Energy. Also it has no kinetic energy when upon contact, as you know kinetic energy = 1/2mv^s and when the block contacts the spring and presses it down the velocity = 0 making kinetic energy = 0, so you know that Ei = Ef, i = initial, f = final, and Ei = Ki + Ui, and Ef = Kf + Uf.
 
Last edited:
Panphobia said:
Also it has no kinetic energy when upon contact
No, it will still have KE on contact. KE only becomes 0 when the spring is fully compressed.
FallingMan said:
They make mgh0 = 1/2kx^2 - mgx
When the spring is fully compressed, the block has descended h0 + x and is again stationary. So ##\frac 12 k x^2 = mg(h_0+x)##
 
FallingMan said:
The block sticks to the spring and momentarily stops after com- pressing the spring 19.0 cm
That is what I meant by it contacts, I am sorry if I was misunderstood.
 
Panphobia and Haruspex,

Thank you for your clear explanation. I was looking at the block as it was contacting the spring, which was overcomplicating my problem. It seems it is much simpler to look at the problem when the kinetic energy is zero in both scenarios, namely at the very top and at the very bottom.

I guess I was also confusing 1/2kx^2 for the kinetic energy when it is the elastic potential energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top