How is the Law of Sines Derived Using the Cross Product?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tronter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Law of sines
tronter
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
How would you use the cross product to derive the law of sines?

A \times B = |A||B| \sin \theta.

Law of sines: \frac{\sin A}{A} = \frac{\sin B}{b} = \frac{\sin C}{c}.

The cross product gives the area of the parallelogram formed by the vectors.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This looks like a homework problem. Next time, ask your homework questions in the homework section. You will get a lot quicker answer if you do.

Having said that, you need to show some work -- we don't just give answers here... But here are some clues:

What does having the cross products of each set of four vectors equal to the area of the parallelogram say about how the cross products relate? Are they the same, different? Draw a picture, set up some equations and play around a bit.

Do the above and then if you still don't get it, show us what you have done and we can give you some more clues...
 
The cross products are equal to each other. And I think its 3 cross products.

So A \times B = A \times C = B \times C

or |A||B| \sin C = |A||C| \sin B = |B||C| \sin A.

Hence \frac{\sin A}{a} = \frac{\sin B}{b} = \frac{\sin C}{c}
 
Last edited:
Yep that's it. All you have to do now is divide throughout by the product (|a| |b| |c|).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top