How is the minimum work needed to push a car up an inclined plane calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The minimum work needed to push a 1000-kg car up a 300 m incline at a 17.5-degree angle can be calculated using the formula Work = mgsin(θ) * d, where θ is the incline angle and d is the distance. For part A, where friction is ignored, the work done is equal to the gravitational force component acting along the incline. In part B, with a friction coefficient of 0.25, the calculation becomes more complex due to the additional forces at play. The discussion emphasizes that for minimum work, the applied force must equal the gravitational component along the incline, leading to a net force of zero. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between lifting the car vertically and pushing it up the incline.
Abu

Homework Statement


What is the minimum work needed to push a 1000-kg car 300 m up a 17.5 degree incline?
A. Ignore friction
B. Assume the coefficient of friction is 0.25

Homework Equations


W = F*d
Net force = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I did:
Work = F*300*cos17.6
but I later realized that the force and distance are both in the same direction, thus the angle would be 0
So that means that the new formula is Work = ma*300... but what is a? Acceleration is equal to force applied minus force of friction divided by mass, but the force applied is not known, and for part A friction is not included.

So I've already looked at other solutions and I found the answer, but I don't understand why it is done this way. Basically the minimum work is equal to mg*300sin17.5.

My question is how come this equation is used instead? Is the work that it takes to lift the car straight upwards the height of the incline equal to the work that it takes to push the car all the way up the inclined, and if so, how come?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abu said:
So that means that the new formula is Work = ma*300... but what is a?
It's better to forget about acceleration and just use the forces. The car experiences a downward force equal to its weight, which is mg. Then we need to draw a vector diagram and split that vertical downwards force into two components, one parallel to the slope and one perpendicular (normal) to it. The normal component is canceled out by the slope pushing back against the car, leaving the parallel force, which is the one you need to multiply by the distance traveled along the slope.

Abu said:
Is the work that it takes to lift the car straight upwards the height of the incline equal to the work that it takes to push the car all the way up the inclined, and if so, how come?
In part A the answer is Yes, because we ignore friction and air resistance and those are the only differences between the work in the two approaches. In part (b) the answer will be No. But I don't know what they expect for part B since rolling motion - which is what the car is doing - is much more complex than sliding motion, so more is needed than just a coefficient of friction. They should have made it a sled rather than a car.
 
  • Like
Likes Abu
Abu said:
Work = ma*300
That equation is wrong.
The work done by a given force Fapp is Fapp*d cos(θ), while the acceleration a satisfies Fnet=ΣF=ma. The applied force Fapp is only one of the contributors to ΣF.
In this problem, you do not need the vehicle to have any residual velocity at the top, so the acceleration can be made arbitrarily small. It becomes, almost, a statics problem, ΣF=0. So what does Fapp equal? (Different answers for parts A and B.)
 
  • Like
Likes Abu
haruspex said:
That equation is wrong.
The work done by a given force Fapp is Fapp*d cos(θ), while the acceleration a satisfies Fnet=ΣF=ma. The applied force Fapp is only one of the contributors to ΣF.
In this problem, you do not need the vehicle to have any residual velocity at the top, so the acceleration can be made arbitrarily small. It becomes, almost, a statics problem, ΣF=0. So what does Fapp equal? (Different answers for parts A and B.)

Oh okay, so let me see if I got this right . Since it is asking for the minimum work, thus the minimum force needed, the net force is zero because any extra force will only contribute to making the car move faster.

So for net force to be zero, the force applied must be equal to the resistant force, which is the component of gravity acting along the incline, which is mgsintheta. so that means force applied equals mgsintheta, and when multiplied by the distance, the formula is Work = mgsin17.5*300.

Am I correct? Thank you.
 
Abu said:
Oh okay, so let me see if I got this right . Since it is asking for the minimum work, thus the minimum force needed, the net force is zero because any extra force will only contribute to making the car move faster.

So for net force to be zero, the force applied must be equal to the resistant force, which is the component of gravity acting along the incline, which is mgsintheta. so that means force applied equals mgsintheta, and when multiplied by the distance, the formula is Work = mgsin17.5*300.

Am I correct? Thank you.
Yes.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top