How Is Trigonometry Used to Calculate Forces on an Arrow's Bottom Beam?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force acting on the bottom beam of the arrow, it is essential to understand the relevant equations and concepts, particularly in trigonometry and vector analysis. The user is designing a mechanism that utilizes a flexible pivot bearing, which requires determining the equivalent force needed for a specific rotation. They have established that a downward force of one pound results in a one-degree clockwise rotation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clearly stating prior attempts and understanding the mathematical principles involved. Seeking guidance on where to study these concepts is encouraged for better problem-solving.
JJ32
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How would I calculate the force acting on the bottom beam in the arrow shown?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/the_other_shots/5726954751/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to poke around and find the proper format for asking this kind of question on this forum. You need to state what the relevant equations are and what you have tried so far to get an answer. If we understand better where you are having difficulty, perhaps we can help. Folks here don't just DO homework problems for you they try to help you figure out how to do them.
 
Hi Phinds,

Thank you for the reply. I am designing a mechanism that will use a flexible pivot bearing (basically a spring bearing) at the rotate point in the diagram, http://www.c-flex.com/ .

For the bearing I want to use, i know that a downward force of 1 pound will give me a rotation clockwise of one degree.

But i will have a force acting on the mechanism in the direction of the arrow.
I would like to calculate the equivalent force that will be required to rotate the mechanism by one degree. I don't know where to start (with vectors?) to calculate the force I will need.

If you would have any hints on what i should be studying/ where i should be researching it would be much appreciated,

Best wishes,
 
Your restatement is more complete but until you find that format I was pointing out, I have no idea what you know and what you don't. Do you know trig for example? You need to state what MATH solution you have attempted and give more of a specific idea what your problem is. Please look for that format.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top