How Is Trigonometry Used to Calculate Forces on an Arrow's Bottom Beam?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force acting on the bottom beam of the arrow, it is essential to understand the relevant equations and concepts, particularly in trigonometry and vector analysis. The user is designing a mechanism that utilizes a flexible pivot bearing, which requires determining the equivalent force needed for a specific rotation. They have established that a downward force of one pound results in a one-degree clockwise rotation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clearly stating prior attempts and understanding the mathematical principles involved. Seeking guidance on where to study these concepts is encouraged for better problem-solving.
JJ32
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How would I calculate the force acting on the bottom beam in the arrow shown?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/the_other_shots/5726954751/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to poke around and find the proper format for asking this kind of question on this forum. You need to state what the relevant equations are and what you have tried so far to get an answer. If we understand better where you are having difficulty, perhaps we can help. Folks here don't just DO homework problems for you they try to help you figure out how to do them.
 
Hi Phinds,

Thank you for the reply. I am designing a mechanism that will use a flexible pivot bearing (basically a spring bearing) at the rotate point in the diagram, http://www.c-flex.com/ .

For the bearing I want to use, i know that a downward force of 1 pound will give me a rotation clockwise of one degree.

But i will have a force acting on the mechanism in the direction of the arrow.
I would like to calculate the equivalent force that will be required to rotate the mechanism by one degree. I don't know where to start (with vectors?) to calculate the force I will need.

If you would have any hints on what i should be studying/ where i should be researching it would be much appreciated,

Best wishes,
 
Your restatement is more complete but until you find that format I was pointing out, I have no idea what you know and what you don't. Do you know trig for example? You need to state what MATH solution you have attempted and give more of a specific idea what your problem is. Please look for that format.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top