How Is Work Calculated in Elliptical Orbits?

AI Thread Summary
Work in elliptical orbits is determined by the dot product of the force and displacement vectors, with the understanding that only motion in the same direction as the force does work. In circular orbits, there is zero acceleration and constant speed, while in elliptical orbits, the body accelerates or decelerates based on its position relative to the gravitational source. The discussion highlights confusion around the application of force components and the angles involved. It clarifies that work is done when there is motion parallel to the force, while perpendicular forces do not contribute to work. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating work in elliptical orbits.
CaptainADHD
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/7206/wtffffftv0.th.jpg http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php

Homework Equations



Work is the dot product of force vector and displacement vector. Centripetal acceleration is velocity squared divided by radius -- multiply by mass to get force.

The Attempt at a Solution



Parallel does no work, perpendicular speeds it up ----->>> which is wrong (failed this question).

I understand that objects in circular orbit have zero acceleration and thus constant speed. But with elliptical orbits, the body is speeding up or slowing down depending on its position relative to the body exerting gravitational force upon it.

What exactly is parallel to the planet itself? I'm having a hard time understanding how to apply force components when I don't know what the angles are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm following this correctly, it will be the reverse answer of what you gave. Work is done only if there is some motion in the same direction of the force. By parallel, they mean parallel to the movement of the planet, or in the same direction as the V arrow. Perpendicular is perpendicular to the motion, or the force that tries to smash the planet into the sun. It doesn't move that way, so no work by perpendicular, and parallel speeds it up.
 
krausr79 said:
If I'm following this correctly, it will be the reverse answer of what you gave. Work is done only if there is some motion in the same direction of the force. By parallel, they mean parallel to the movement of the planet, or in the same direction as the V arrow. Perpendicular is perpendicular to the motion, or the force that tries to smash the planet into the sun. It doesn't move that way, so no work by perpendicular, and parallel speeds it up.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top