How Long Does It Take a Skier to Descend a 320m Hill at 2.30 m/s²?

  • Thread starter Thread starter soapyshrimp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes a skier to descend a 320m hill at an acceleration of 2.30 m/s², the motion should be analyzed in vertical and horizontal components. The skier starts from rest and accelerates uniformly down the slope. The total distance can be calculated using the angle of the hill and the vertical height change. The relevant equations of motion can be applied to find the time taken for the descent. Understanding these principles is essential for solving the problem effectively.
soapyshrimp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A skier is accelerating down a 30.0° hill at a = 2.30 m/s2 (Fig. 3-36).

How long will it take her to reach the bottom of the hill, assuming she starts from rest and accelerates uniformly, if the elevation change is 320 m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should post these questions in the homework forum, and you have to at least attempt an answer.
But to get you started,

Split the motion into vertical and horizontal components (draw a diagram)
What do you know about motion of an object under gravity?


ps. giving it a title that says something about the question will help somebody decide to answer it.
 
sorry, I am knew at this. I've already drawn the diagram, but my teacher is not very good at this and kind of just gives us assignments and tells us to teach ourselves with notes that arent very helpful. so i don't really know to much about working this type of problem
 
No problem ;-)

There are 3 equations for calcualting speed, distance, accelearation - depending which you know and which you want to find. They are detailed here https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110015

You are given the accelearation along the hill so that's easy.
All you need to find is the total distance the skier goes, and you can find that from the angle and the vertical change in height you are given.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top