How Long Does It Take for a Cop to Catch a Speeder?

AI Thread Summary
A cop sets up a radar trap and a speeder continues at 60 km/h while the cop accelerates at 5 m/s². Calculations show that it takes approximately 6.67 seconds for the cop to reach the speeder when starting immediately. When accounting for a 1-second reaction time, the cop's equation changes, leading to a quadratic equation that results in two solutions, one of which is not valid as it occurs before the cop starts moving. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the reaction time to the cop's acceleration phase, clarifying that the extra second should not reduce the acceleration time.
Rectifier
Gold Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
4
This problem was translated from Swedish, sorry for any grammatical errors present.

1. The problem
A cop sets up a radar trap. A speeder passes the policeman and continues going at ##60km/h## even though the maximal allowed speed is ##50km/h##. The cop starts accelerating at ##5 m/s^2## directly (without reaction-time) . The speeder does not notie anything and continues at the same speed.

a) how many seconds does it take for the policeman to reach the speeder
b) If the speeder has a constant velocity v and the cop has a constant acceleration a, find an expression for the time it takes for the cop to reach the speeder.
c) Now, assume that the cop ( in a) ) has a reaction time of ##1## second (chase starts one second later). Find a quadratic equation and solve it to find the time it takes for the cop to reach the speeder.​

Homework Equations


## d = v_0t + \frac{at^2}{2} ##
1km = 1000m
1h = 3600secs


3. The attempt
a)

With the help of ## d = v_0t + \frac{at^2}{2} ## I construct two equations:
## d_1 = v_0t + \frac{at^2}{2}=60km/h \cdot t \ s = \frac{60}{3.6}m/s \cdot t \ s \\ d_2 = \frac{5t^2}{2} ##

the cop reaches the speeder when ##d_1 = d_2##
##d_1 = d_2 \\ \frac{60}{3.6}t = \frac{5t^2}{2} \\ \frac{5t^2}{2}-\frac{60}{3.6}t = 0 \\ t(\frac{5t}{2}-\frac{60}{3.6}) = 0 \\ t_1 = 0 \\ t_2: \\ \frac{5t}{2}- \frac{60}{3.6}=0 \\ t_2=\frac{2 \cdot 60}{3.6 \cdot 5}=6.667... \ sec ##

The cop reaches speeder at t=6.667. ##t_1## is the moment when speeder passes the cop in the beginning.

b) expression
## \frac{vt}{3.6} = \frac{at^2}{2} \\ \frac{at^2}{2}-\frac{vt}{3.6} = 0 \\ t(\frac{at}{2}-\frac{v}{3.6}) = 0 \\ t_1 = 0 \\ t_2 : \\ \frac{at}{2} = \frac{v}{3.6} \\ t_2 = \frac{2v}{3.6a} =\frac{v}{1.8a} ##

A test for v=60 and a=5 gives us:
## t_2 = \frac{v}{1.8a} = \frac{60}{1.8 \cdot 5}=6.667... ##

c)
The policeman starts 1 second later. The graph would then move one second to the right.

The equation for the cop is therefore
## d_1 = v_0t + \frac{at^2}{2}=60km/h \cdot t \ s = \frac{60}{3.6}t \ s \\ d_2 = \frac{5(t-1)^2}{2} ##

The equation for the speeder stays the same

##d_1 =d_2## gives

##d_1 = d_2 \\ \frac{60}{3.6}t = \frac{5(t-1)^2}{2} \\ \frac{5(t-1)^2}{2} - \frac{60}{3.6}t = 0 \\
(5 t^2)/2-5 t+5/2- \frac{60}{3.6}t = 0 \\ ##
Wolfram gives me ## t_1 = 0.116963 ## and ## t_2 = 8.5497 ##
:))

I was expecting to get ##t_1 = 0## and t_2 like ##7.7## or something.

Am I doing something wrong here? Please help :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rectifier said:
The equation for the cop is therefore...

Have a think about that bit again. You have added subtracted 1 second to the part of the equation that deals with the acceleration of the cop. That's not correct, he doesn't accelerate for an extra second less time. The extra second occurs before he starts to accelerate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Rectifier
CWatters said:
Have a think about that bit again. You have added subtracted 1 second to the part of the equation that deals with the acceleration of the cop. That's not correct, he doesn't accelerate for an extra second. The extra second occurs before he starts to accelerate.
So in other words I should not count with t_1 since its <1, am I right?
 
Not sure I understand your #3

I would have written...

d1 = distance traveled in one second + distance traveled in the time t
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top