How Long Does It Take for a Copper Sphere's Potential to Increase by 1000V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time required for a copper sphere with a nickel coating to increase its potential by 1000V due to emitted electrons from radioactive decay. The initial approach involves determining the electric field and net charge required for the potential increase, using formulas related to electric fields and potentials. A correction is pointed out regarding the formula for the electric field outside a charged conducting sphere, which should use the radius squared in the denominator. The conversation emphasizes the need to accurately calculate the total net charge and the number of electrons involved. Understanding the correct application of these formulas is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
A solid copper sphere whose radius is 1.0cm has a very thin surface coating of nickel. Some of the nickel atoms are radioactive and emit an electron with each decay. Due to the geometry of the situation, half of these electrons enter the copper sphere, each carrying away a charge of -e. The nickel coating has an activity of 10mCi(millicuries) = 3.70 x 10^8 radioactive decays per second. The sphere is hung from a long, nonconducting string and isolated from its surroundings.

How long will it takefor the potential of the sphere to increase by 1000V?

While it is easy to work out the net charge of copper = the no. of -e decayed, and the energy gained by copper, I don't really know what they meant by potentials of the sphere in this case. Since potential has unit of Joules / Coulomb, does it mean that in this case,

Potentials = Total Energy Gain / Total charge of the sphere??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential is the energy required (to charge)per unit charge or dU/dq
 
I had a think of the problem, afterwards. Below is my working. Potentials is created via the existence of an electric field. So, the electric field needed is

E = V / r.
V = 1000, r = 0.01m
Then put

E = kQ / r and obtain a value for the total net charge Q required.

Then use the Q / e to find the number of electrons.

Is this the correct way in solving the problem? Here I'm assuming that the surface potential are same at all point.
 
Hyperreality said:
I had a think of the problem, afterwards. Below is my working. Potentials is created via the existence of an electric field. So, the electric field needed is

E = V / r.
V = 1000, r = 0.01m
Then put

E = kQ / r and obtain a value for the total net charge Q required.

Then use the Q / e to find the number of electrons.

Is this the correct way in solving the problem? Here I'm assuming that the surface potential are same at all point.
there's an error in your formula for E outside a charged conducting sphere.
it should be:
E = kQ/r2
see the URL links below for the potential of a charged conducting sphere and how to calculate it from the E field. (then you can determine Q and Q/e like you indicated above.)
http://230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/potsph.html#c1
http://230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/potpoi.html#c2
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top