How long does it take for the pedestrian to reach the front of the vehicle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter caseys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a pedestrian to travel across the hood of a braking vehicle during a collision scenario. The vehicle is decelerating with a coefficient of friction of 0.88, while the pedestrian experiences a lower coefficient of 0.3 over a distance of 4 feet. The initial common velocity at the windshield is 35 feet per second, complicating the calculations. The approach suggested involves considering the frictional force acting on the pedestrian and the vehicle's motion, while also factoring in the negative acceleration of the vehicle. Ultimately, the problem requires careful consideration of both the pedestrian's and vehicle's dynamics to determine the time and distance involved.
caseys
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This physics problems has me stumped...a vehicle is braking at the time of a collision with a pedestrian. The vehicle is decelerating on a coefficient of friction (cof) of a 0.88. The vehicle and pedestrian reach a common velocity at the windshield of 35 fps. The pedestrian decelerates across the engine hood of the vehicle for a distance of 4 feet on a cof of 0.3

What I am trying to figure out is the amount of time for the pedestrian to exit the front of the vehicle along with the distance that the vehicle traveled during this time.

If the vehicle was not moving the pedestrian would travel 4 feet with a cof of .3 in 0.165 seconds. But with the vehicle moving in the same direction as the pedestrian but with a higher cof of 0.88 this makes the problem more complex.

It is my belief that the time for the pedestrian to travel across the hood would be higher than 0.165 seconds but can not get my brain in gear to figure out the problem.

Any helps or ideas are appreciated.

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a rather gruesome problem!

I think the way to approach is recognize that the hood is exerting a force on the pedestrian equal to the frictional force (coefficient times weight). Then you just have to account for the motion of the car. I would approximate that the motion of the car is affected very little by the pedestrian. Of course you COULD include that as well (momentum conservation) but you certainly know your requirements better than I do!
 
I think you must keep in mind that the beginning of the problem, the pedestrian and the vehicle have a common velocity. If you take this velocity as zero, you can then calculate the negative acceleration of the car and determine how long it would take the pedestrian (at that rate of acceleration) to travel 4 feet to the front end of the hood, if the pedestrian and a drag coefficient of zero.

After that, you can factor in the pedestrian's drag coefficient and subtract that from his rate of acceleration towards the nose of the car.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top