How long to reach the speed of light?

AI Thread Summary
Traveling at a constant acceleration of 9.80665 m/s², one can never reach the speed of light, only approach it. The calculations provided estimate the percentage of light-speed achieved over various time intervals, showing significant increases over time. For example, after one year, the speed approaches 77.454% of light-speed, and after five years, it reaches 99.993%. There was confusion regarding the initial assumption of speed versus acceleration, which was clarified in the discussion. The final values were debated, with a consensus that the velocity continues to increase without ever reaching the speed of light.
Pragz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assuming you are traveling at 9.80665 m/s in space, how long would it take to reach light-speed?

My teacher told us the question was in-part a trick; we can never truly reach the speed of light, only get very close. She told us to simply give the percentage of the speed of light we'll be traveling at these intervals:

1 day, 7 days, 31 days,
1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years​


Homework Equations


Equation given: tanh(V/c)​


The Attempt at a Solution


1 day: .283%
7 days: 1.98%
31 days: 8.74%
1 year: 77.454%
2 years: 96.823%
5 years: 99.993%
10 years: 99.99%

And I think that's it. Something about by numbers seem... just, off. I might just be being paranoid.​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How exactly is the speed increasing?
 
An uninhibited, constant acceleration produced by what I can assume to be rockets, thrusters, or space-gnomes blowing into external sails really hard.

But seriously, we were just told a constant acceleration of 9.80665 m/s that is never affected (slowed, skewed, or otherwise manipulated off its course of a direct line forward) by gravity, solar wind, etc.
 
Uot

Pragz said:

Homework Statement


Assuming you are traveling at 9.80665 m/s in space,

I think you meant "Assuming you are accelerating at 9.80665 m/s^2"

The Attempt at a Solution


1 day: .283%
7 days: 1.98%
31 days: 8.74%
1 year: 77.454%
2 years: 96.823%
5 years: 99.993%
10 years: 99.99%

And I think that's it. Something about by numbers seem... just, off. I might just be being paranoid.​

The last number can't be right. Your velocity keeps on increasing, even if it stays below c all the time.
 


willem2 said:
I think you meant "Assuming you are accelerating at 9.80665 m/s^2"

Whoops, my mistake. :redface:

willem2 said:
The last number can't be right. Your velocity keeps on increasing, even if it stays below c all the time.

Well, the number wasn't exactly 99.99. It was something along the lines of 99.996 with a bunch of trailing numbers. We were told to round to the thousandths, though why I did it to the hundredths in some of these I cannot remember. Probably related to the fact that the math was done at about 2 AM and the post shortly followed. XP
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top