How Many 200 mg Tablets Are Needed for a 2% Solution in a 3 oz Bottle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rich_E2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
Rich_E2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I need your help on a calculation...

I have 200 milligram dissolvable tablets, and a 3 ounce dropper bottle of water. How many tablets would I need to add to the water to make a 2% solution?

The chemistry/math is a bit confusing to me because the tables are measured in mass (i.e. mg), whereas water is measured in volume (i.e. oz.).

Thanks in advance for your help

-Rich
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It would help if you had everything in the same systems of units...leave your tablets in milligrams but convert your bottle of water from ounces into grams (or milligrams)...things should then get easier
 
I'm terrible at math.

Does anyone know the answer?

Thanks.
 
one liter of water contains 1000 grams = 1000 ml
one 200 milligram tablet = .2 grams
so 100 tablets = 20 grams
20g/1000g = 2% solution

3 oz = 88.5 ml
so x / 88.5 = 100 / 1000
so you add 8.85 ( 200 mg ) tablets / 3 oz water = 2% solution
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top