Chemistry How Many Atoms in 2.5 Moles of NH3?

AI Thread Summary
To find the total number of atoms in 2.5 moles of NH3, you multiply the number of moles by the number of atoms per molecule and Avogadro's number. Each NH3 molecule contains four atoms, so the calculation is 2.5 moles multiplied by 4 atoms per molecule and Avogadro's constant (6.02 x 10^23). This results in a total of 6.02 x 10^24 atoms in 2.5 moles of NH3. It is clarified that one mole of ammonia contains four moles of atoms, not just four atoms. The final answer confirms the correct total number of atoms.
kasakato
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the total number of atoms in the molecules?
NH3 - 2.5 mole

Homework Equations


Would you multiply the number of atoms in NH3 by Avogadro constant to find the number of atoms?
(4 atoms)(6.02*10^23)
=answer

Or would you multiply the number of moles by Avogadro constant, and then multiply that by the number of atoms?
(2.5 moles)(6.02*10^23)
=x- number of molecules in 2.5mole of NH3

(x)(4 atoms)
=answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost. Set Up the calculation according to your known units. 1 mole of ammonia is composed of 4 atoms. You have how many moles of given ammonia?

2.5 moles ammonia * (4 moles of atoms per mole of ammonia) * (AvogNumber... I will not finish this, but you should try to finish it.
 
Excellent, thank you.

Just to simplify things, as a skeleton formula, it would look like:

Total atoms = (total moles)(number of atoms in formula)(Avg con)

In the case of the original question:
Total atoms=(2.5)(4)(6.02x10^23)
Total atoms= 6.02x10^24
 
kasakato said:
Total atoms= 6.02x10^24

Correct.
 
Borek said:
Correct.

Thanks. :) I finished off the rest of my questions without a hitch.
 
I made an error in post #2, saying:
1 mole of ammonia is composed of 4 atoms.

One mole of ammonia molecules contains FOUR moles of ATOMS.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top