How Many ATP Molecules Are Used in a Single Bicep Muscle Contraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kawrae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Muscle
AI Thread Summary
Approximately 1.6 x 10^-3 moles of ATP are required for a single bicep muscle contraction when lifting a 10kg weight 0.5m, equating to around 49 joules of work. This calculation uses the energy release from ATP hydrolysis, which is 30.5 kJ per mole. Multiplying the required moles by Avogadro's number results in an estimate of about 9.6 x 10^20 molecules of ATP needed for the contraction. The discussion highlights the complexity of calculating ATP usage specific to muscle contractions rather than general ATP production processes. Overall, the estimate suggests that roughly 10^21 ATP molecules are utilized during a single bicep contraction.
Kawrae
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
>> Calculate approximately how many molecules of ATP are required for a standard muscle like the biceps during the contraction phase of a single twitch.

I honestly do not even know where to begin here... I don't think he wants us to go through and just outline Glycolysis/Kreb's Cycle/ETC because that's just producing ATP in general, not for a specific contraction. And that's not saying how much is NEEDED...

I've looked around on the internet but can't really seem to come up with an answer. I know that calcium is needed but again, I can't figure out how much.

Does anyone think they could help me out? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are tons of different ways to approach this problem, from the very simple to the very involved. I'll go a very simple way. Let's take the bicep, for instance. Let's say you lift a 10kg weight 0.5m directly upward (using only your bicep somehow). This requires your bicep to do:
$$W = mgh = (10kg)(9.8m/s^2)(0.5m) = 49J$$
worth of work. ATP hydrolysis releases 30.5 kJ mol-1. This means that the number of moles of ATP required to do 49 J worth of work is:
$$\frac{49J}{30500J\cdot mol^{-1}}=1.6\times 10^{-3} mol$$
To get number of molecules, simply multiply by Avogadro's number:
$$(1.6\times 10^{-3} mol)(6.022 \times 10^{23} mol^{-1}) = 9.6 \times 10^{20}$$
So an order of magnitude estimate would be roughly 1021 molecules of ATP per muscle contraction.
 
  • Like
Likes SciencewithDrJ
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top