How many combinations are possible with the four quantum numbers?

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
1. how many combinations are possible with the four quantum numbers?

2. Does Pauli's exclusion principle apply only to electrons within the same atom?

can it apply across atoms as well? how is the exclusion principle generalized across atoms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.: Which quantum numbers do you mean? Electrons in an atom? The number is (countable) infinite.

2.: No, it is valid for all electrons, but in systems with multiple atoms you get different energy eigenstates and therefore different quantum numbers.
 
San K said:
1. how many combinations are possible with the four quantum numbers?

In principle, an infinite number. In practice, it depends on how high you can go with the principal quantum number (n) in a particular physical situation. As n increases, it becomes easier to ionize an atom and more difficult to keep it together. Look at the energy levels for hydrogen, for example, and see how they approach E = 0 as n increases.
 
jtbell said:
In principle, an infinite number. In practice, it depends on how high you can go with the principal quantum number (n) in a particular physical situation. As n increases, it becomes easier to ionize an atom and more difficult to keep it together. Look at the energy levels for hydrogen, for example, and see how they approach E = 0 as n increases.

Thanks mfb and jtbell.

1. How many combinations are possible with the four quantum numbers, with/when principal quantum number (n) = 1?

Assume these are electrons around a nucleus.

2. In a system with multiple atoms:

Is n=1 different than n=1 in a neighbouring atom, for determining the combinations and permutations of the four quantum numbers?
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
803
Back
Top