How many equations are there for the unit circle?

Wesleytf
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
hopefully we all know x^2 + y^2 =1 and x=cost y=sint, t between 0 and 2pi.

There's also one with slope;

x= (1-t^2)/(1+t^2)
y= (2t)/(1+t^2)

I was wondering if this counts as a separate one

x+iy=e^it, t also between 0 and 2pi

or if this is analogous to the trig parameterization. I don't know a whole lot of trig(I'm not really a math man per se), but something in my gut tells me these two aren't really different... Anyway, I was just curious. I'd also be interested in any other ones.

I don't know much about hyperbolic geometry, can there be a unit circle for that?

I'm also starting to work through something as a set of ratios, but does anyone else have any other ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I was wondering if this counts as a separate one

x+iy=e^it, t also between 0 and 2pi

or if this is analogous to the trig parameterization.

It is analogous. Euler's identity eit = cost + isint.
 
There's also r=cost and r=sint, i don't know if you'd count them as unit circles though (they are off centre).
 
How about x^2 + y^2 = 1 + a - a for any a? :-p

It doesn't make much sense to ask this question, there are infinitely many equations we can come up with.
 
Wesleytf said:
x=cos a y=sin a, a between 0 and 2pi.
x= (1-t^2)/(1+t^2)
y= (2t)/(1+t^2)
This derives from the first by setting
<br /> t=\tan\frac{a}{2}<br />
An in fact they all can be found this way. Plug in any function (that has the required range) for a variable.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top