How many functions satisfy this set of conditions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying functions that satisfy the conditions f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) and f(a) = 1. It is noted that while there are infinitely many functions that meet the first condition, the second condition is believed to restrict the solution to a unique logarithmic function. A proposed method involves defining a new function h(x) to demonstrate that two functions satisfying both conditions must be identical. The conversation also touches on the implications of continuity and the use of Cauchy's functional equation to derive unique solutions under certain conditions. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that with additional constraints, the only function that satisfies both conditions is f(x) = log(x).
AdrianZ
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
How many functions satisfy this set of conditions? 1) f(x.y) = f(x) + f(y). 2) f(a)=1.
I was trying to define a logarithmic function abstractly as a map from R+ to R satisfying those 2 conditions that this question came to my mind. It's obvious that there are infinitely many functions satisfying the 1st condition (each logarithmic function in an arbitrary base satisfies the first condition). but I hope that the 2nd condition could be used to prove that only one fixed function satisfies both conditions (namely, I want to prove that only loga satisfies both conditions and then I'll use this idea to abstractly define the map loga: R+ -> R).
Is there any way to prove or disprove this conjecture? I've been trying to prove it from tomorrow morning and have failed so far. my idea is to define h(x) = f(x) - g(x) where f and g are functions with the same domain satisfying those 2 conditions and then to show that h(x)=0 for all x's in the domain.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you require of your function f? I'm assuming it is real-valued, but what set is it from? You example of log is just a function \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}. Are we just looking for a function A \to \mathbb{R} where A is any set of real numbers that contains a and is closed under multiplication? Furthermore do you require f to be continuous?

One approach you may try is to define F : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} by
F(x) = f(e^x)
F will then satisfy Cauchy's functional equation (look it up on e.g. Wikipedia if you have never heard of it) which should help you conclude some stuff about the solutions. In particular if you require some nice conditions like continuity at a point you will get a unique solution, but otherwise you will have an infinite family of solutions.
 
If you are using the axiom of choice there are infinitely many and all of them except log are really horrible. You probably want some other condition on f. Many would work but the standard choice is
for all 0<x,y
1) f(x.y) = f(x) + f(y). 2) f'(1)=1.
There is only one such function f(x)=log(x)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top